2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2016.0068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vanishing point detection using random forest and patch‐wise weighted soft voting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further reading Fan, X. and Shin, H. (2016), "Road vanishing point detection using weber adaptive local filter and salient-block-wise weighted soft voting", IET Computer Vision, Vol. 10 No.…”
Section: Corresponding Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Further reading Fan, X. and Shin, H. (2016), "Road vanishing point detection using weber adaptive local filter and salient-block-wise weighted soft voting", IET Computer Vision, Vol. 10 No.…”
Section: Corresponding Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the complex background that contains most of the interferences also severely affect the accuracy of vanishing point detection. Intrinsically, current methods for vanishing point detection can be generalized into two main categories (Fan et al, 2016): texture-based methods and edge-based methods. In the texture-based methods, texture orientation of each pixel is first calculated by the Gabor filters (Kong et al, 2009), the Laplacian of Gaussian filters (Kong et al, 2013) or the Weber local descriptors (Yang et al, 2016;Fan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In view of the characteristics of hyperspectral remote sensing images, the classification of random forest algorithms may be a good choice. The random forest algorithm is a supervised self-training classifier [27][28][29][30] that consists of many classification trees, each of which completes its own sorting operation. The final classification results are determined by the voting results of each classification tree [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%