Vapour-phase method in the synthesis of polymer-ibuprofen sodium-silica gel composites

Abstract

The study discusses the synthesis of polymer-silica composites comprising water soluble drug (ibuprofen sodium, IBS). The polymers selected for this study were poly(TRIM) and poly(HEMA--TRIM) produced in the form of permanently porous beads via the suspension-emulsion polymerization method. The acid and base set ternary composites were prepared by the saturation of the solid dispersions of drug (poly(TRIM)-IBS and/or poly(HEMA--TRIM)-IBS) with TEOS, and followed by their exposition to the vapour mixture of water and ammonia, or water and hydrochloric acid, at autogenous pressure. The conducted analyses reveal that the internal structure and total porosity of the resulting composites strongly depend on the catalyst which was used for silica precursor gelation. The parameters characterizing the porosity of both of the acid set composites are much lower than the parameters of the base set composites. Moreover, the basic catalyst supplied in the vapour phase does not affect the ibuprofen sodium molecules, whereas the acid one causes transformation of the ibuprofen sodium into the sodium chloride and a derivative of propanoic acid, which is poorly water soluble. The release profiles of ibuprofen sodium from composites demonstrate that there are differences in the rate and efficiency of drug desorption from them. They are mainly affected by the chemical character of the polymeric carrier but are also associated with the restricted swelling of the composites in the buffer solution after precipitation of silica gel.

Hybrid mesoporous silica with controlled drug release

“…The cumulative release data have been fitted to the theoretical and the empirical equations of zero and first order kinetics, Higuchi model, Hixson-Crowell model and Korsmeyer-Peppas model. 47,48 All they showed the reasonable fits to the first hour data, while the fit quality got worse over the 24 h interval. The coefficients of determination (R 2 ) of the aforementioned models applied to the 24 h data were between 0.85 and 0.98 varying non-systematically between the samples.…”