2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00425-002-0793-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of chromosomal DNA contents in maize ( Zea mays L.) inbred and hybrid lines

Abstract: The flow karyotypes of different maize (Zea mays L.) inbred and hybrid lines were analyzed. The accumulation and isolation of large quantities of high-quality metaphase chromosomes from root tips was achieved from many kinds of maize lines. The chromosome suspensions were prepared by a simple slicing method from synchronized maize root tips and analyzed by flow cytometry. Variations of experimental flow karyotypes were detected among inbred and hybrid lines in terms of the positions and/or the numbers of chrom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have documented differences in the content for several classes of repetitive DNA between maize inbreds at the chromosomal level (Kato et al 2004). Flow cytometry studies have also documented significant variation in the size of the maize genome between different inbred lines (Laurie and Bennett 1985;Lee et al 2002). Sequence-based methodologies have documented maize genome structural diversity at a higher resolution (for reviews, see Buckler et al 2006;Messing and Dooner 2006).…”
Section: Structural Diversity In Maizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have documented differences in the content for several classes of repetitive DNA between maize inbreds at the chromosomal level (Kato et al 2004). Flow cytometry studies have also documented significant variation in the size of the maize genome between different inbred lines (Laurie and Bennett 1985;Lee et al 2002). Sequence-based methodologies have documented maize genome structural diversity at a higher resolution (for reviews, see Buckler et al 2006;Messing and Dooner 2006).…”
Section: Structural Diversity In Maizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seedlings were then treated with 1.0 µ M trifluralin (DowElanco, Midland, MI, USA), kept at room temperature for 4 h, washed by distilled water, and placed in ice water for 20-24 h. Then the root tips were excised and fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde in MgSO 4 buffer (50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgSO 4 7H 2 O, 5 mM HEPES, pH 8.0) for 20 min at room temperature. After washing three times with MgSO 4 buffer for 5 min each, meristems (1-1.5 mm) of 40 root types were dissected and transferred into a 1.5 mL Eppendolf tube containing 0.5 mL isolation buffer (50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgSO 4 7H 2 O, 5 mM HEPES, 3 mM dithiothreitol, 0.25% Triton-X 100, pH 8.0) (Lee et al, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alkaloid Lee et al (1996Lee et al ( , 2002 *Number of chromosomes in a haploid set. **Number of chromosomes that could be discriminated unambiguously.…”
Section: Accumulation Of Mitotic Cells In Metaphasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, a whole range of cytogenetic stocks, including deletions, translocation and chromosome additions, has been found useful to discriminate speci¢c chromosomes and chromosome arms in a variety of species (Table 1 Gill , Li et al 2001, Kubala¤ kova¤ et al 2002, 2003a, 2003b. Simulated £ow karyotypes have been employed to predict a feasibility of discriminating individual chromosome types depending on di¡erences in relative DNA content and on the coe⁄cient of variation of the chromosome peaks (Lysa¤ k et al 1999, Lee et al 2002). The karyotypes were modelled using computer spreadsheet software (Conia et al 1989) or a dedicated computer program (Dolez› el 1991) based on relative chromosome length or relative chromosomal DNA content.…”
Section: Flow Karyotyping and Discrimination Of Single Chromosome Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%