2004
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of fMRI activation during a phonological and semantic language task in healthy subjects

Abstract: Assessing inter-individual variability of functional activations is of practical importance in the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in a clinical context. In this fMRI study we addressed this issue in 30 right-handed, healthy subjects using rhyme detection (phonologic) and semantic categorization tasks. Significant activations, found mainly in the left hemisphere, concerned the inferior frontal gyrus, the superior/middle temporal gyri, the prefrontal cortex, the inferior parietal lobe, the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

24
150
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
24
150
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Right hemisphere activation was present in all controls during the category fluency task, compared to only 4 controls in the letter fluency task. This is consistent with previous studies that have reported right hemisphere involvement in tasks which require semantic processing (Bookheimer, 2002;Gold and Kertesz, 2000;Kang et al, 1999;Seger et al, 2000;Seghier et al, 2004).…”
Section: Task-related Differences In Activation: Letter Fluency Vs Csupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Right hemisphere activation was present in all controls during the category fluency task, compared to only 4 controls in the letter fluency task. This is consistent with previous studies that have reported right hemisphere involvement in tasks which require semantic processing (Bookheimer, 2002;Gold and Kertesz, 2000;Kang et al, 1999;Seger et al, 2000;Seghier et al, 2004).…”
Section: Task-related Differences In Activation: Letter Fluency Vs Csupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Large betweensubjects variability previously has been reported for a language task (Seghier, et al 2004) and a working memory task (Wei, et al 2004). The observed variability of activations across groups and cortical areas can be explained by a combination of anatomic variability in gyri formation (Ojemann et al, 1989;Woods et al, 1999) and individual cognitive strategy (Nadeau, Williamson et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Individual subject clusters were determined to belong to an ROI if they fell within 15 mm from the group cluster center. The value of 15 mm was chosen based on the published inter-subject variability for similar tasks (Seghier et al, 2004), and on our own preliminary data where activated regions for a subset of subjects with different genders and ages were identified according to their relative Talairach coordinates and corresponding anatomical landmarks. Brodmann areas (BA) for these ROIs were determined on the basis of the closest BA reported by the Talairach Daemon (Lancaster, et al 2000), which accepts single point coordinates and reports BA labels and anatomical structures within a predefined spatial-query range.…”
Section: Data Processing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The left superior parietal cortex (BA7) has been implicated in a phonologic and semantic language task (Seghier et al. 2004), visual attention to phonemes (McDermott et al. 2003) as well as observing gestures and pantomime (Ohgami et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2004), visual attention to phonemes (McDermott et al. 2003), observing gestures and pantomime (Ohgami et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%