Variability of updated finite element models and their predictions consistent with vibration measurements

Abstract

Abstract:A case study on a small-scale laboratory vehicle frame is used to investigate the variability of the updated finite element (FE) models that arises from model and measurement errors and demonstrate the effect of this variability on response predictions. Conventional weighted modal residuals and recently introduced multi-objective identification methods for structural model updating are used to provide the entire spectrum of Pareto optimal FE models consistent with the measured modal data. Similarities and differences between the two model updating methods are explored and the advantages of the multi-objective identification methods are emphasized. A significant variability in Pareto optimal models is observed, which is indicative of the uncertainty in the updated FE models. The dependence of the variability of the Pareto models on the information contained in the measured data and the size of model and measurement errors is explored by varying the number of measured modes, number of sensors, FE mesh discretization sizes, and number of model parameters. The effectiveness of the updated Pareto optimal models and their predictive capabilities are assessed. Frequency response functions and fatigue lifetime predictions are used as example of structural performance variables in order to demonstrate the variability in the response predictions that arises from the variability in the Pareto optimal models. A large variability in the response predictions is observed that cannot be ignored in decisions based on updated FE models. The multi-objective optimization method provides the general framework for properly accounting for model uncertainty in model-based response predictions consistent with measured data.

Finite Element Model Developed and Modal Analysis of Large Scale Steam Turbine Rotor: Quantification of Uncertainties and Model Updating

“…Minimizing at global minimum the following single objective, traditionally solves the parameter estimation problem: w [6,20,23].…”

Model Updating of a Nonlinear Experimental Vehicle Using Substructuring and Unscented Kalman Filtering

“…The proposed computational framework is now applied to the laboratory structure of Fig.4, that has been designed for small-scale simulations of vehicle frames [3,4]. The frame structure is characterized by predominantly linear response and high modal density and it is supported to four "suspension" systems with strongly nonlinear behavior.…”

“…A main challenge involved in the updating procedures pertains to the oftentimes large number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) involved. To tackle with this problem, appropriate substructuring methods in either the time or the frequency domain have been developed and are commonly employed [2][3][4].…”

Optimum Design, Finite Element Model Updating and Dynamic Analysis of a Full Laminated Glass Panoramic Car Elevator

“…The system was tested in fixed-free boundary condition. First, all the necessary elements of the FRF matrix required for determining the response of the frame substructure were determined by imposing impulsive loading [1,2,8,9]. The measured frequency range was 0-2048 Hz, which includes the analytical frequency range of interest, 0-400 Hz.…”