2017
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2016.2614899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of Ventricular Repolarization Dispersion Quantified by Time-Warping the Morphology of the T-Waves

Abstract: Abstract-Objective: We propose two electrocardiogram (ECG)-derived markers of T-wave morphological variability in the temporal, dw, and amplitude, da, domains. Two additional markers, d NL w and d NL a , restricted to measure the non-linear information present within dw and da are also proposed. Methods: We evaluated the accuracy of the proposed markers in capturing T-wave time and amplitude variations in 3 situations: (1) In a simulated set up with presence of additive Laplacian noise, (2) when modifying the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
136
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
136
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, the 2 most distant RRI bins from the median RRI, distributed symmetrically around this median RRI (Figure B, green bin), were chosen as those defining the maximum intrasubject RRI range, ΔRRI (Figure B, blue and red bins, respectively), ie, ΔRRI=RRI 2 −RRI 1 . Representative T‐waves. Two T‐waves representative of the average T‐wave morphology for RRI 1 and RRI 2 were computed using a warping method recently described by our group . According to our hypothesis, these 2 T‐waves, called mean warped T‐waves, capture information regarding the dispersion of repolarization at RRI 1 and RRI 2 . Quantification of T‐wave morphological differences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Next, the 2 most distant RRI bins from the median RRI, distributed symmetrically around this median RRI (Figure B, green bin), were chosen as those defining the maximum intrasubject RRI range, ΔRRI (Figure B, blue and red bins, respectively), ie, ΔRRI=RRI 2 −RRI 1 . Representative T‐waves. Two T‐waves representative of the average T‐wave morphology for RRI 1 and RRI 2 were computed using a warping method recently described by our group . According to our hypothesis, these 2 T‐waves, called mean warped T‐waves, capture information regarding the dispersion of repolarization at RRI 1 and RRI 2 . Quantification of T‐wave morphological differences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our hypothesis, these 2 T‐waves, called mean warped T‐waves, capture information regarding the dispersion of repolarization at RRI 1 and RRI 2 . Quantification of T‐wave morphological differences. The morphological differences between the 2 mean warped T‐waves were quantified using a previously defined index, d w . Figure .D1 shows both mean warped T‐waves, where their morphological difference can be appreciated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2. Mean warped T-waves: The mean warped T-waves of the T-waves within RRI PI 1 (i) and RRI PI 2 (i) were calculated by time-warping as in [9]. Each mean warped T-waves is a representative of the average T-wave morphology at RRI PI 1 (i) and RRI PI 2 (i), and compensate for the possible morphological differences introduced by eventual different histories of RRIs [5].…”
Section: T-wave Morphology Restitution Using Patient-independent Rr Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantification of the T-wave morphological differences: The morphological differences between the i-th [9]. Before applying the methodology, the gravity centres of both mean warped T-waves were aligned to only account on changes in the T-wave morphology, and not on global shifts (see [9] for details). 4.…”
Section: T-wave Morphology Restitution Using Patient-independent Rr Rmentioning
confidence: 99%