2008
DOI: 10.1179/106698108790818459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in Pelvic Morphology May Prevent the Identification of Anterior Pelvic Tilt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
3
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
39
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, soft tissue artifact can cause erroneous measurements of hip joint kinematics during dynamic loading for all anatomic planes, including rotation about the sagittal and coronal plane . It has also been shown that participant‐specific pelvic bony anatomy is necessary to measure in vivo pelvic tilt accurately . Though we cannot definitively attribute the discrepancies between our results and previous studies to the limitations and errors of skin marker motion capture, we are confident that hip kinematics reported herein were accurate given that errors for DF are submillimeter and subdegree …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Further, soft tissue artifact can cause erroneous measurements of hip joint kinematics during dynamic loading for all anatomic planes, including rotation about the sagittal and coronal plane . It has also been shown that participant‐specific pelvic bony anatomy is necessary to measure in vivo pelvic tilt accurately . Though we cannot definitively attribute the discrepancies between our results and previous studies to the limitations and errors of skin marker motion capture, we are confident that hip kinematics reported herein were accurate given that errors for DF are submillimeter and subdegree …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The examiner then placed one caliper arm tip of the palpation meter on the anterior superior iliac spine and the other on the posterior superior iliac spine. An intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92–0.99 has been reported for measurements of pelvic tilt using this technique 14, 15.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Despite known differences in the shape of the pelvis according to sex and age171819 a single equation is currently used for all subjects. The aim of this study was to investigate whether sex and/or age specific regression equations improve the accuracy in locating the HJC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%