Variations in operating room staff compliance with mandatory daily electronic COVID-19 symptom screening

Geßner, Daniel; Sun, Eric; Fielding‐Singh, Vikram

doi:10.1016/j.bja.2022.09.014

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a study by Kennedy et al (2021) front-door screeners reported that although they felt the majority of those being screened were often or always willing to participate found that some ignored, refused, or avoided screening stations. Similarly for virtual screening, Gessner et al (2023) found staff compliance with mandatory daily electronic COVID-19 symptom screening was 85.8% (standard deviation of 3.9%), and room compliance (the number of operating rooms that exclusively contained compliant staff) to be much lower at 31.8% (standard deviation 7.8%).…”

Section: Screening Technology Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Screening Technologies to Support Infection Prevention and Control in Long-Term Care

Wheeler

Attef

Trudel

et al. 2023

Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many clinical environments implemented Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) screening technologies at entry points to identify and isolate cases. Despite the widespread adoption of screening technologies in vulnerable care settings, such as in long-term care (LTC) homes, implementations and protocols have yet to be thoroughly reviewed in the literature. Therefore, the Dynamic Sustainability Framework was applied to identify the limitations of various screening technology implementations. Based on identified limitations, design recommendations are put forward to support healthcare planning and design teams of long-term care homes, and clinical facilities to improve infection prevention and control (IPC).

show abstract

Section: Screening Technology Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 96%