1998
DOI: 10.2503/jjshs.67.856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varietal Differences in Plant Regeneration from Solid and Suspension Cultures in Onion (Allium cepa L.).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of calli that regenerated shoots among the calli transferred onto RE medium was 34% for the embryogenic calli and 58% for the LL type calli. These regeneration frequencies were comparable with a previous report by Tanikawa et al (1998), who tested 22 onion cultivars and obtained an average regeneration frequency of 43.6% for the embryogenic calli and 60.5% for the LL type calli. Thus, we considered that these calli were suitable for transformation experiments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The percentage of calli that regenerated shoots among the calli transferred onto RE medium was 34% for the embryogenic calli and 58% for the LL type calli. These regeneration frequencies were comparable with a previous report by Tanikawa et al (1998), who tested 22 onion cultivars and obtained an average regeneration frequency of 43.6% for the embryogenic calli and 60.5% for the LL type calli. Thus, we considered that these calli were suitable for transformation experiments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…We preliminarily examined the frequency of plant regeneration from both radiclederived embryogenic calli and proliferated LL type calli in suspension cultures prepared by the methods of Tanikawa et al (1998). The percentage of calli that regenerated shoots among the calli transferred onto RE medium was 34% for the embryogenic calli and 58% for the LL type calli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations