VEDLIoT: Very Efficient Deep Learning in IoT

Kaiser, Martin; Griessl, René; Kucza, Nils; Haumann, Carola; Tigges, Lennart; Mika, Katie; Hagemeyer, Jens; Porrmann, Florian; Rückert, Ulrich; Berge, Micha vor dem; Krupop, Stefan; Porrmann, Mario; Tassemeier, M.; Trancoso, Pedro; Qararyah, Fareed; Zouzoula, Stavroula; Casimiro, António; Bessani, Alysson; Cecílio, José; Andersson, S.; Brunnegard, Oliver; Eriksson, Olof; Weiß, Roland; Mcierhofer, F.; Salomonsson, Hans; Malekzadeh, E.; Ödman, Daniel; Khurshid, Anum; Felber, Pascal; Pasin, Marcelo; Schiavoni, Valerio; Ménétrey, Jämes; Gugala, K.; Zierhoffer, Piotr; Knauss, Eric; Heyn, Hans-Martin

doi:10.23919/date54114.2022.9774653

Cited by 6 publications

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

An empirical investigation of challenges of specifying training data and runtime monitors for critical software with machine learning and their relation to architectural decisions

Heyn,

Knauss,

Malleswaran

et al. 2024

Requirements Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development and operation of critical software that contains machine learning (ML) models requires diligence and established processes. Especially the training data used during the development of ML models have major influences on the later behaviour of the system. Runtime monitors are used to provide guarantees for that behaviour. Runtime monitors for example check that the data at runtime is compatible with the data used to train the model. In a first step towards identifying challenges when specifying requirements for training data and runtime monitors, we conducted and thematically analysed ten interviews with practitioners who develop ML models for critical applications in the automotive industry. We identified 17 themes describing the challenges and classified them in six challenge groups. In a second step, we found interconnection between the challenge themes through an additional semantic analysis of the interviews. We explored how the identified challenge themes and their interconnections can be mapped to different architecture views. This step involved identifying relevant architecture views such as data, context, hardware, AI model, and functional safety views that can address the identified challenges. The article presents a list of the identified underlying challenges, identified relations between the challenges and a mapping to architecture views. The intention of this work is to highlight once more that requirement specifications and system architecture are interlinked, even for AI-specific specification challenges such as specifying requirements for training data and runtime monitoring.

show abstract