1956
DOI: 10.2307/1943577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

50
1,134
1
28

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,564 publications
(1,213 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
50
1,134
1
28
Order By: Relevance
“…species distributions in forested wetlands are related to flood frequency and duration (Bedinger, 1971;Leitman et aI.. 1982;Paratley and Fahey, 1986;Hughes, 1990). This implies optimum positions for each species • Corresponding aulhor. along a hydrologic gradient in a manner similar to that described for elevation gradients in the Great Smoky mountains by Whittaker (1956) and agrees with the individualistic concept of Gleason (1926). Phipps (1979) and Phipps and Applegate (1983) proposed optimum positions for wetland forest species along a hydrologic gradient.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…species distributions in forested wetlands are related to flood frequency and duration (Bedinger, 1971;Leitman et aI.. 1982;Paratley and Fahey, 1986;Hughes, 1990). This implies optimum positions for each species • Corresponding aulhor. along a hydrologic gradient in a manner similar to that described for elevation gradients in the Great Smoky mountains by Whittaker (1956) and agrees with the individualistic concept of Gleason (1926). Phipps (1979) and Phipps and Applegate (1983) proposed optimum positions for wetland forest species along a hydrologic gradient.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In the absence of theory, one can still proceed by empirical methods and decide upon an applicable curve on the basis of many empirical results. Early studies by Gause (1930), Curtis & Mcintosh (1951) and Whittaker (1956) showed that monotonie response curves are too simple as an ecological response model and that a unimodal model is more appropriate. Simple ecological reasoning shows that also bimodal curves are a realistic option: a species can be outcompeted near its physiological optimum by more competitive species whereas the species may be able to cope with less favourable environmental conditions when competition is less.…”
Section: Model Choice and Regression Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the method of weighted averaging is also used in Section 3.7 to estimate the indicator value of a species, in particular, by taking a weighted average of values of an environmental variable (Equation 3.28). The weighted average was proposed as a biotic index for many types of organisms: for vascular plants by Ellenberg (1948) and by Whittaker (1956); for algae by Zelinka & Marvan (1961); and for faunal communities in streams and rivers by Chutter (1972). A typical example is Ellenberg's (1948; system for predicting soil acidity, reviewed by Böcker et al (1983).…”
Section: Weighted Averaging Using Indicator Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 -Patrocínio/MG A amostragens foi realizada entre 18º47' a 19º45'S e 46º25' a 47º09'W, incluindo áre-as dos municípos de Patrocínio, Ibiá e Pratinha, com altitude média de 950 m. Dentre os locais amostrados, foi onde se notou Para avaliar a diversidade alfa nas comunidades foram utilizados os índices de Shannon-Wienner (H'), que atribui maior peso a espécies raras, e o índice de Simpson (D), que é pouco influenciado por espécies raras (Magurran 1988). A diversidade beta foi avaliada pelo índice de Whittaker (b), que mede a mudança ou taxa de substituição na composição de espé-cies de um local para outro (Whittaker 1960). Este índice varia de 0, quando duas amostras não apresentam nenhuma diferença na composição de espécies e 2, quando esta diferença é máxima, sendo calculado pela fórmula: ß = (c/a) -1, onde: c = total de espécies nas parcelas amostradas; a = média do número de espécies das parcelas amostradas.…”
Section: -Paracatu/mgunclassified