2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventricular activity cancellation in electrograms during atrial fibrillation with constraints on residuals’ power

Abstract: a b s t r a c tDuring atrial fibrillation (AF), cancellation of ventricular activity from atrial electrograms (AEG) is commonly performed by template matching and subtraction (TMS): a running template, built in correspondence of QRSs, is subtracted from the AEG to uncover atrial activity (AA). However, TMS can produce poor cancellation, leaving high-power residues. In this study, we propose to modulate the templates before subtraction, in order to make the residuals as similar as possible to the nearby atrial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the fact that a promising application of CGCD to AF EGMs was revealed, this work contained only unipolar EGMs, which are quite unusual in daily electrophysiological procedures of AF ablation. In addition, the risk of significant ventricular contamination under unipolar recordings is high [ 65 ], and despite the QRS subtraction that was performed, four seconds is not an adequate interval for an effective ventricular removal [ 40 , 66 ]. As ventricular deflections can be even larger than atrial in unipolar EGMs, the corresponding CGCD values may very likely appear altered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the fact that a promising application of CGCD to AF EGMs was revealed, this work contained only unipolar EGMs, which are quite unusual in daily electrophysiological procedures of AF ablation. In addition, the risk of significant ventricular contamination under unipolar recordings is high [ 65 ], and despite the QRS subtraction that was performed, four seconds is not an adequate interval for an effective ventricular removal [ 40 , 66 ]. As ventricular deflections can be even larger than atrial in unipolar EGMs, the corresponding CGCD values may very likely appear altered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, these methods are more suitable to generate body surface ECGs rather than EGMs. The work in [41] generates atrial EGMs by simulating the activation of the atrial fibers from the movement of a single dipole, which is less realistic. In this work we focus on the atrial cell level to model the action potential during atrial fibrillation and extend it to the two-dimensional monodomain tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total stimulation signal length was set to 8 ms, with the first part of the biphasic signal being 2 ms in accordance with the clinical stimulation setup. Atrial activities were modeled following Corino et al (2013) based on a moving dipole in an infinite homogeneous conductor. The atrial activity synthetic signal morphology was scaled to have an amplitude of 2 mV and duration of 35 ms ( Figure 4A ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%