2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2009.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vessel diameter and xylem hydraulic conductivity increase with tree height in tropical rainforest trees in Sulawesi, Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional views of hydraulic limitation include (1) declines in leaf area-specific hydraulic conductance with increasing tree height; (2) declines in w leaf with tree height due to decreased whole-plant hydraulic conductance and increased gravitational potential; and (3) resulting decreases in average stomatal conductance (Ryan and Yoder 1997, Koch et al 2004, Ryan et al 2006, Hinckley et al 2011, Mencuccini et al 2011. Factors that might contribute to a tighter relationship of maximum tree height to P/E p than expected based on hydraulic limitation (and thus D) alone might include (4) increased allocation to leaves vs. roots or stems at a given height with increasing P/E p , or conditions correlated with higher P/E p (e.g., greater soil silt or nitrate content); (5) higher photosynthetic rates per unit leaf mass at higher P/E p or under conditions correlated therewith, independent of the degree of stomatal limitation; (6) higher leaf area-specific conductance at higher P/E p in trees of a given height, reflecting differences in wood density and xylem diameter and length (Thomas 1996b, Thomas and Bazzaz 1999, Zach et al 2010, Fan et al 2012, Gleason et al 2012; (7) variation across species in the rate at which mesophyll photosynthetic capacity declines with decreasing w leaf (Givnish 1986, Tezara et al 2003, Lawlor and Tezara 2009); (8) variation across sites in which the rate at which evaporation from sunlit leaves increases with relative height at the top of the canopy; and (9) greater uncertainties in measuring average D than average height. The preceding factors are all plausible ways in which resource allocation or modified hydraulic limitation effects could constrain tree height along the Victoria transect, in response to the increase in P/E p toward the Yarra Ranges, the reduced heat load and cloudier conditions at higher altitudes and latitudes there, and the increasingly fine-grained, more P-and Nrich soils there (see Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditional views of hydraulic limitation include (1) declines in leaf area-specific hydraulic conductance with increasing tree height; (2) declines in w leaf with tree height due to decreased whole-plant hydraulic conductance and increased gravitational potential; and (3) resulting decreases in average stomatal conductance (Ryan and Yoder 1997, Koch et al 2004, Ryan et al 2006, Hinckley et al 2011, Mencuccini et al 2011. Factors that might contribute to a tighter relationship of maximum tree height to P/E p than expected based on hydraulic limitation (and thus D) alone might include (4) increased allocation to leaves vs. roots or stems at a given height with increasing P/E p , or conditions correlated with higher P/E p (e.g., greater soil silt or nitrate content); (5) higher photosynthetic rates per unit leaf mass at higher P/E p or under conditions correlated therewith, independent of the degree of stomatal limitation; (6) higher leaf area-specific conductance at higher P/E p in trees of a given height, reflecting differences in wood density and xylem diameter and length (Thomas 1996b, Thomas and Bazzaz 1999, Zach et al 2010, Fan et al 2012, Gleason et al 2012; (7) variation across species in the rate at which mesophyll photosynthetic capacity declines with decreasing w leaf (Givnish 1986, Tezara et al 2003, Lawlor and Tezara 2009); (8) variation across sites in which the rate at which evaporation from sunlit leaves increases with relative height at the top of the canopy; and (9) greater uncertainties in measuring average D than average height. The preceding factors are all plausible ways in which resource allocation or modified hydraulic limitation effects could constrain tree height along the Victoria transect, in response to the increase in P/E p toward the Yarra Ranges, the reduced heat load and cloudier conditions at higher altitudes and latitudes there, and the increasingly fine-grained, more P-and Nrich soils there (see Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern of whole-plant integration might suggest limited latitude for compensatory change in any single trait as height varies. Yet several studies have shown that maximum tree height among species locally increases with stem hydraulic conductivity per unit leaf area (Addington et al 2009, Zach et al 2010, Fan et al 2012, and therefore, often increases with xylem vessel diameter and the initial rate of height growth and decreases with wood density (King 1991, Thomas and Bazzaz 1999, Zach et al 2010, Fan et al 2012, Gleason et al 2012. Kempes et al (2011) present a flow-based model to account for variation in maximum tree height across the contiguous United States, supposedly also taking stem allometry into account.…”
Section: Photosynthetic Hydraulic Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possibly as a result, it is known that species with a low wood density including dipterocarp species generally grow faster than species with a high wood density in a tropical rain forest (Suzuki 1999;Turner 2001). Moreover, Bebber (2002) reported that the wood density of dipterocarp species is closely related to vessel diameter, indicating that trees with a low wood density and a large vessel diameter achieve a high maximum rate of transpiration, because of the high efficiency of water transport in the xylem, but may suffer increased susceptibility to cavitation through drought (Tyree et al 1994;Williams et al 2001;Zach et al 2010). Soil types and soil water content are also related to tree water use, given a soil water retention capability (Bucci et al 2004a;Meinzer et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…higher Ψ S ) (Bucci et al. 2009), or increasing the efficiency of xylem to transport water (Brodribb, Holbrook & Gutiérrez 2002; Zach et al. 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%