Victims and conferencing

Vanfraechem, Inge

doi:10.4324/9780203070826-8

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also, due to lack of familiarity with restorative justice, there is a need to promote participants' understanding of the principles and practices of RJC (Shapland et al 2011). Studies have demonstrated that victims' unrealistic expectations were associated with dissatisfaction (Morris et al 1993;Vanfraechem 2015). This indicates the importance of providing realistic expectations, particularly for victims, in preparation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4 Although the convenors interviewed in this study only mentioned the need for follow-up for offenders, follow-up for victims is also important. Several studies have showed that lack of notification about offender compliance with outcome plans is associated with victim dissatisfaction (Maxwell et al 2004;Maxwell and Morris 1993;Vanfraechem 2015). Recent research on FGC in NSW suggests that level of victim satisfaction can even be decreased when victims fail to receive notification regarding offender compliance (Wagland et al 2013).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Restorative Justice Conferencing as a ‘Holistic’ Process: Convenor Perspectives

Suzuki

Wood

2017

Current Issues in Criminal Justice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Restorative justice conferencing (RJC) has demonstrated strengths over traditional criminal justice approaches, including victim satisfaction and redress, and offender perceptions of legitimacy and fairness. However, less is known about how and why. This research examines conference convenor perspectives concerning how and why RJC 'works' in terms of such outcomes. The convenor perspective is a poorly investigated area in RJC research, despite the pivotal role that convenors play as 'key' participants in RJC practice. Based on semi-structured interviews with convenors involved in the Youth Justice Group Conferencing program in Victoria, findings highlight that not only face-toface dialogue, but also preparation and follow-up play distinct and important roles in the outcomes of RJC. As preparation and follow-up phases are often dismissed or compromised in practice, this article suggests that RJC should be clearly articulated and implemented as a 'holistic' process that requires equal attention to all three phases.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Restorative Justice Conferencing as a ‘Holistic’ Process: Convenor Perspectives

Suzuki

Wood

2017

Current Issues in Criminal Justice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Restorative Justice Conferencing as a ‘Holistic’ Process: Convenor Perspectives

Suzuki

Wood

2017

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Restorative justice conferencing (RJC) has demonstrated strengths over traditional criminal justice approaches, including victim satisfaction and redress, and offender perceptions of legitimacy and fairness. However, less is known about how and why. This research examines conference convenor perspectives concerning how and why RJC ‘works’ in terms of such outcomes. The convenor perspective is a poorly investigated area in RJC research, despite the pivotal role that convenors play as ‘key’ participants in RJC practice. Based on semi-structured interviews with convenors involved in the Youth Justice Group Conferencing program in Victoria, findings highlight that not only face-to-face dialogue, but also preparation and follow-up play distinct and important roles in the outcomes of RJC. As preparation and follow-up phases are often dismissed or compromised in practice, this article suggests that RJC should be clearly articulated and implemented as a ‘holistic’ process that requires equal attention to all three phases.

show abstract

“…These corruption cases made the Indonesian Muslims disappointed as their holy Qur'an became the object of corruption. Those corruption cases damaged the reputation of the MoRA, an institution that was supposed to maintain values and norms like honesty, kindness and truth [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Corruption Prevention at the Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs through the Online Tashih Services

Martiningsih¹,

Zamhari²,

Matin³

et al. 2023

Proceedings of the 5th International Graduate Conference in Islam and Interdisciplinary Studies, IGCIIS 2022, 19-20 October 202

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Corruption in procurement of the Qur'an at the Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs (MoRA) became a phenomenal case in 2012. This case is a huge challenge for MoRA to obtain public trust as it involved the Holy Qur'an, a book considered by Muslims as sacred. This study uses interviews, document and recapitulation data from tashih online application, and observation. Here, accountability and transparency were the important points to rectifying public services, so as to create a zone of integrity that was free from corruption, collusion, and nepotism. MoRA established Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf al-Qur'an (LPMQ/the Committee of Rectifying of the Qur'an) to check the validity of the master draft of the Qur'an; thereby avoiding this book from any typographical error. In 2018, LPMQ launched an online rectification (tashih online) to give a better service to society throughout Indonesia and to regain their trust.

show abstract

Victims and conferencing

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Restorative Justice Conferencing as a ‘Holistic’ Process: Convenor Perspectives

Restorative Justice Conferencing as a ‘Holistic’ Process: Convenor Perspectives

Restorative Justice Conferencing as a ‘Holistic’ Process: Convenor Perspectives

The Corruption Prevention at the Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs through the Online Tashih Services

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About