Video-assisted Colonic Conduit

Tobias-Machado, Marcos; Starling, E.; Korkes, Fernando; Silva, Matheus Neves Ribeiro da; Appolonio, Paulo Roberto; Wroclawski, Eric Roger

doi:10.1097/sle.0b013e3181a9d1d8

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[45] Advantages by maintaining an intermittent faecal and continuous urine flow, less stoma stenosis, use of non-irradiated loops, cosmetic appearance and quality of life seems to encourage more attention to those options. [45]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[4]Double-barrelled wet colostomy – previously described, retroperitoneal and minilaparotomy associated access with 3-4 trocars (one of this planned in the stoma site), laparoscopic dissection of ureter and colonic loop, exteriorisation of ureters and colon through a 4-6 cm incision, isolation of loop and extracorporeal intestinal and ureteral anastomosis. [5]…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[1–3] In some cases, urinary diversion is an option for extrinsic obstruction or fistulas, usually caused by external beam radiation therapy. [4]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Long-term experience on laparoscopic incontinent urinary diversion unrelated to cystectomy in radiated or recurrent pelvic malignancies

et al. 2013

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND:There are few reports describing series of cases about development on laparoscopic urinary diversions no related to cystectomy. The aim of this paper is to show the experience of our reference institutions for treatment of pelvic malignancies when laparoscopic techniques were applied to perform only urinary diversion without cystectomy or pelvic exenteration.MATERIALS AND METHODS:We included retrospectively 12 cases of cutaneous ureterostomy and 21 cases with a reservoir (16 ileal conduits, 2 colonic conduits and 3 wet colostomies) treated in our institute from 2004 to 2010. It was evaluated operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, conversion rate, length of large incision, post operative complications, analgesic consumption, time to food intake, hospital stay, time to recovery to normal activities. Mean time to follow-up was 3(2-7) years. RESULTS:All procedures were completed without conversions. In the cutaneous ureterostomy group the mean surgical time.

show abstract