2020 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM) 2020
DOI: 10.23919/softcom50211.2020.9238303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video Quality Assessment: Some Remarks on Selected Objective Metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on YouTube recommendations for 480 p video, the following coding bitrates were used for the video test samples: 500 kbps, 600 kbps, 700 kbps, 800 kbps, 900 kbps, 1 Mbps, 1.5 Mbps, and 2 Mbps. The author’s earlier study [ 32 ] confirmed that this range of bitrates guarantees an acceptable quality of the examined videos for the mentioned spatial resolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Based on YouTube recommendations for 480 p video, the following coding bitrates were used for the video test samples: 500 kbps, 600 kbps, 700 kbps, 800 kbps, 900 kbps, 1 Mbps, 1.5 Mbps, and 2 Mbps. The author’s earlier study [ 32 ] confirmed that this range of bitrates guarantees an acceptable quality of the examined videos for the mentioned spatial resolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In such a situation, we compare the quality of the same video before and after the degradation process. The results correlate with the quality perceived by the users taking part in the subjective assessment procedure [ 32 ]. On the other hand, it can be noted that PSNR values may significantly differ when comparing completely different video samples even if the examined source material is not distorted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations