2015
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Videodermatoscopy‐assisted Mohs micrographic surgery vs. other treatments for lentigo maligna in 54 patients with a long‐term follow‐up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further inclusion criteria were lesion diameter, ranging from 1 cm to 2 cm (± 0.1–0.2 cm) and conventional surgical excision, respecting a surgical margin of 0.5 cm ± 1 cm. The study criteria specified the exclusion of mucosal and ocular MMs as well as lesions of the ears and eyelids (low density of follicles) and patients treated with Mohs surgery (horizontally cut sections do not include sufficient information on hair follicle histopathology) [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further inclusion criteria were lesion diameter, ranging from 1 cm to 2 cm (± 0.1–0.2 cm) and conventional surgical excision, respecting a surgical margin of 0.5 cm ± 1 cm. The study criteria specified the exclusion of mucosal and ocular MMs as well as lesions of the ears and eyelids (low density of follicles) and patients treated with Mohs surgery (horizontally cut sections do not include sufficient information on hair follicle histopathology) [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we suggest considering the OCT‐assisted‐MMS and the VDS‐assisted‐MMS as second line options, particularly indicated for nodular tumors and horizontal spreading lesions, respectively. Furthermore, since VDS is a widely distributed technology, VDS‐assisted‐MMS should be preferred to MMS alone in any case guaranteeing a better definition of neoplastic margins and reducing required MMS stages, as evidenced by our data 19,21 . In the end, BS‐assisted‐MMS, HFUS‐assisted‐MMS and MSOT‐assisted‐MMS should be considered as ancillary techniques with great potential but must be validated by larger case studies and through multicenter trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Furthermore, since VDS is a widely distributed technology, VDS-assisted-MMS should be preferred to MMS alone in any case guaranteeing a better definition of neoplastic margins and reducing required MMS stages, as evidenced by our data. 19,21 In the end, BS-assisted-MMS, HFUS-assisted-MMS and MSOT-assisted-MMS should be considered as ancillary techniques with great potential but must be validated by larger case studies and through multicenter trials. Nonetheless, each technique involves certain consideration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Weitere Einschlusskriterien waren der Durchmesser der Läsion (zwischen 1 cm und 2 cm, ± 0,1–0,2 cm) und eine konventionelle operative Exzision mit einem Sicherheitsabstand von 0,5 cm ± 1 cm. Die Studienkriterien sahen den Ausschluss von Patienten mit mukosalen oder okulären Melanomen vor, ebenso von Patienten mit Läsionen an den Ohren oder Augenlidern (geringe Follikeldichte) und von Patienten, die mittels Mohs‐Chirurgie behandelt wurden (horizontal geschnittene Sektionen liefern nicht genügend Informationen über die Histopathologie der Haarfollikel) [17].…”
Section: Materials Und Methodenunclassified