Violating psychological contract terms amongst Maltese public service employees: occurrence and relationships

Abstract

The psychological contract is the construct through which one attempts to explain the quality of the employment relationship from the point of view of each of the contract party with regards to obligations and inducements and can be employed to explain organizational change dynamics. Failing to provide promised obligations is termed as violation. This study examined the occurrence of contract violation amongst 132 Maltese public service employees at a time when radical changes in practices were being proposed. Violation was conceptualised in two ways: under‐fulfilled employer obligations and over‐fulfilled employee obligations. Results show that whereas employees were likely to report that their employer violated obligations, they themselves were more likely to over‐fulfil their obligations towards their employer. In addition, contract term violations were related to important work outcomes and generally in a different way for the two forms of violation. Results are discussed and future research suggestions highlighted.

Protecting relational assets: a pre and post field study of a horizontal business combination

“…Based on this reasoning as well as empirical support from the organizational literature (e.g., Cassar 2001;Johnson and O'Leary-Kelly 2003), we hypothesize that:…”

The Effects of Psychological Contract Fulfilment and Public Service Motivation on Organizational Commitment in the French Civil Service

“…Coyle-Shapiro and Kessler (2002) confirmed these results concerning the norm of reciprocity in the English public sector, which is defined by Gouldner (1960) as a universal need to reciprocate after having received some benefits. Cassar (2001) found that psychological contract violation amongst Maltese public service employees was negatively associated with trust, commitment and job satisfaction. Guest and Conway (1998), who also studied psychological contracts in the English public sector; found that the reduction of trade union power could explain the perception of the increasing breach in the psychological contract in English public services.…”

The effects of psychological contract breach on various employee level outcomes: The moderating role of Islamic work ethic and adversity quotient

“…Sometimes, employees feel organizational mistreatment is too verse and further, they perceive more chances of same treatment, so they decide to leave organization and seek new venues for employment. Most of the research studies reported consistent results that psychological contract breach (PCB) tends to decrease employee's positive and proactive attitude towards organization, in fact, it is negatively influenced on employee behaviors including organizational commitment, job satisfaction and increases employee's intent to quit the job (Topa and Morales, 2005a, c;Coyle-Shapiro and Kessler, 2002;Guglielmi, 2003;Mc Donald and Makin, 2000;Cassar, 2001): P 1 : Perceptions of psychological contractbreach has a positive impact on intention to quit and negative impact on employees' commitment and job satisfaction. Figure 1 shows the conceptual model of this paper.…”