Violence against health care workers in China, 2013–2016: evidence from the national judgment documents

Abstract

BackgroundIncidents of patient-initiated workplace violence against health care workers have been a subject of substantial public attention in China. Patient-initiated violence not only represents a risk of harm to health care providers but is also indicative of general tensions between doctors and patients which pose a challenge to improving health system access and quality. This study aims to provide a systematic, national-level characterization of serious workplace violence against health care workers in China.MethodsThis study extracted data from the China Judgment Online System, a comprehensive database of judgment documents. Three key phrases, “criminal case,” “health care institution,” and “health care worker” were used to search the China Judgment Online System for relevant cases between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. Data extracted from identified cases was used to document the occurrence, the degree of risk, and the factors associated with serious workplace violence.ResultsIn total, 459 criminal cases involving patient-initiated workplace violence against health care workers in China were reported and processed. The analysis revealed geographic heterogeneity in the occurrence of serious workplace violence, with lower incidence in western provinces compared to central and eastern provinces. Primary hospitals experienced the highest rates of serious workplace violence and emergency departments and doctors were at higher risk compared with other departments and health workers. Perpetrators were primarily male farmers aged 18 to 44 with low levels of education. The most frequently reported reasons of serious patient-initiated workplace violence included perceived medical malpractice by the perpetrator after the death of a patient, death of a patient with no other reason given, failures of the compensation negotiations after the death of a patient, and dissatisfaction with the treatment outcomes.ConclusionsSerious workplace violence against providers varies across regions and types of health care institutions in China. Perception of low-quality care is the most reported reason for violence. Efforts should be made to improve quality of care in the low-level health institutions and strengthen the doctor-patient communication during the whole course of service.

Living with COVID-19: a phenomenological study of hospitalised patients involved in family cluster transmission

“…Workplace violence against healthcare workers in China has been well documented. 30 31 In Chinese culture, healthcare workers are primarily charged with the responsibilities to treat the disease rather than the patient. Owing to the strict visiting restrictions imposed during the outbreak, family members and caregivers were not allowed to accompany the patients, and nurses took the major responsibility for basic care provision.…”

Trends in Workplace Violence Involving Health Care Professionals in China from 2000 to 2020: A Review

“…The combination of actual or feared physical attacks and verbal attacks troubles Chinese medical staff because they are obligated to fulfill vital and often busy roles [ 10 ]. Workplace violence in medical institutions could be an indicator of the general tension between doctors and patients, which could in turn compromise the accessibility and quality of the health care system [ 11 ].…”

Nursing rounds: A quality improvement project to improve outpatient satisfaction

“…The evaluations of the outpatient department in 2015 indicated issues of concern to the administration. The significant causes of workplace violence, patient dissatisfaction and lack of safety in China are long wait times, rejection of a request, dissatisfaction with the treatment process, dissatisfaction with staff attitude, dissatisfaction with treatment outcome and death‐related issues (Cai et al., 2019). The issues that contribute to patient dissatisfaction and impact the safety in the department were issues identified by patients on the hospital–patient satisfaction questionnaires.…”