2018
DOI: 10.1002/oa.2662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Violence targeting children or violent society? Craniofacial injuries among the pre‐Hispanic subadult population of Gran Canaria (Canary Islands)

Abstract: The approach to Gran Canaria's pre‐Hispanic period has traditionally been dominated by a romantic and propitious view of its indigenous populations advocating a historical evolution on the margin of the conflicts and contradictions common to any society. Yet new data indicate that the ancient Canarians were subject to high rates of internal violence linked to the island's isolation and harsh biogeographical conditions, as well as marked personal differences and a strong hierarchization of the social order. How… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, archaeologists and anthropologists try to find different pieces of evidence they can point to of violence among populations. The presence of violence can be interpreted both through artefacts (e.g., tool‐weapons and artistic representations; Thorpe, ) or traces of injuries to the bones (Valasco‐Vázquez, Delgado‐Darias, & Alberto‐Barroso, ). Of course, for bioarchaeological study, skeletal evidence provides useful insights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this context, archaeologists and anthropologists try to find different pieces of evidence they can point to of violence among populations. The presence of violence can be interpreted both through artefacts (e.g., tool‐weapons and artistic representations; Thorpe, ) or traces of injuries to the bones (Valasco‐Vázquez, Delgado‐Darias, & Alberto‐Barroso, ). Of course, for bioarchaeological study, skeletal evidence provides useful insights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%