2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04280-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual reality for pain control during shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized controlled study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, two studies have investigated the effects of AV stimulation using VR device on pain, anxiety, and relaxation during ESWL for ureteral stones [18,19]. Candela et al reported the median pre-procedure pain and anxiety VAS scores were 1 (0-2) and 3 (2-5) respectively, whereas they were 4 (2-7) and 1 (0-2) after the procedure and the HypnoVR® device is a clinical-friendly and safe device during ESWL for upper urinary tract stones [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, two studies have investigated the effects of AV stimulation using VR device on pain, anxiety, and relaxation during ESWL for ureteral stones [18,19]. Candela et al reported the median pre-procedure pain and anxiety VAS scores were 1 (0-2) and 3 (2-5) respectively, whereas they were 4 (2-7) and 1 (0-2) after the procedure and the HypnoVR® device is a clinical-friendly and safe device during ESWL for upper urinary tract stones [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Candela et al reported the median pre-procedure pain and anxiety VAS scores were 1 (0-2) and 3 (2-5) respectively, whereas they were 4 (2-7) and 1 (0-2) after the procedure and the HypnoVR® device is a clinical-friendly and safe device during ESWL for upper urinary tract stones [18]. Weynants et al showed the control group not using VR experienced signi cantly more pain compared to the AVVR group (mean VAS-score = 4.94 vs 4.01; p = 0.011) [19]. The mean total delivered energy was signi cantly higher in the AVVR group compared to the control group (55.2 J vs. 48.8 J; p = 0,037).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] Patients who inevitably tolerate pain during lithotripsy processes have poor pain relief, delayed recovery, and bad patient satisfaction. [9][10][11] Numerous conventional treatments are used for pain relief during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, and they mainly include pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods. [12][13][14] Pharmacological approaches may result in adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, gastric bleeding and respiratory depression etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6–8] Patients who inevitably tolerate pain during lithotripsy processes have poor pain relief, delayed recovery, and bad patient satisfaction. [9–11]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%