2020
DOI: 10.1177/0162643420960093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Reality Job Interview Training in Transition Services: Results of a Single-Arm, Noncontrolled Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Trial

Abstract: This study reports the results of a single-arm, noncontrolled, Type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial evaluating virtual reality job interview training (VR-JIT) delivered in five preemployment transition programs comprising 15 schools, 10 administrators, 23 teachers, and 279 youth ages 16–21 years receiving special education preemployment transition services. Fidelity, expected implementation feasibility, and teacher and student acceptance of VR-JIT were high. Youth completed virtual interviews ( M =… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to translating VIT-TAY into real-world outcomes, the Pre-ETS + VIT-TAY group was significantly more likely to obtain a competitive and integrated job when compared to Pre-ETS only (25.0% vs 0.0% and OR = 16.0). These findings are consistent with prior research among individuals using virtual interviewing tools to enhance their job interview skills (Smith, Fleming, Wright, Jordan, et al, 2015;Smith, et al, 2021). In addition, we found that 16.7% of the Pre-ETS + VIT-TAY group transitioned from internships or volunteering into jobs at those locations (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…With respect to translating VIT-TAY into real-world outcomes, the Pre-ETS + VIT-TAY group was significantly more likely to obtain a competitive and integrated job when compared to Pre-ETS only (25.0% vs 0.0% and OR = 16.0). These findings are consistent with prior research among individuals using virtual interviewing tools to enhance their job interview skills (Smith, Fleming, Wright, Jordan, et al, 2015;Smith, et al, 2021). In addition, we found that 16.7% of the Pre-ETS + VIT-TAY group transitioned from internships or volunteering into jobs at those locations (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Specifically, this study of VR-JIT used a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design (Curran et al, 2012) to focus primarily on learning how VR-JIT was implemented in 15 schools among 279 students with disabilities receiving Pre-ETS while secondarily evaluating the impact of VR-JIT on employment (M. J. Smith, Smith, et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the results of the aforementioned study were promising (M. J. Smith, Smith, et al, 2021), VR-JIT was originally designed to meet the needs of adults with serious mental illnesses (M.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental development towards the usage of an interview for the selection of applicants has been made obvious as the interviews can be valid if they are properly conducted within a set paradigm (Melinder et al, 2021;Postuma et al, 2002). The process of an interview is remarkably more incomplete, with most research dealing with internships and not the selection of applicants in many of the degree programs (Bakker et al, 2019;Hewitt et al, 2021;Mittenberg et al, 2000;Rotteveel et al, 2021;Smith et al, 2021;Yusoff, 2019). Lopez et al (1996) surveyed 115 interviews of directors that were the second frequently used selection method for applicants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structured interview mainly focuses on pre-planned problems and issues. Whereas few interviewers inquire questions in a sequence, while remaining are in relax approach, both have a centre of attention on pre-planned questions (Isham et al, 2021;Smith et al, 2021). The structured interviews protect besides discrimination in selection or rejection as it suggested asking the same questions from the applicants (Seldman, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%