2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visibilities and bolometric corrections for stellar oscillation modes observed byKepler

Abstract: Context. Kepler produces a large amount of data used for asteroseismological analyses, particularly of solar-like stars and red giants. The mode amplitudes observed in the Kepler spectral band have to be converted into bolometric amplitudes to be compared to models. Aims. We give a simple bolometric correction for the amplitudes of radial modes observed with Kepler, as well as the relative visibilities of non-radial modes. Methods. We numerically compute the bolometric correction c K−bol and mode visibilities … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
113
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
13
113
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Brown et al (1991) and Kjeldsen & Bedding (1995) have conjectured that ν max scales as the star cutoff frequency, ν c ∝ g/ √ T eff . This relation was shown to work for a larger variety of stars (Bedding & Kjeldsen 2003;Stello et al 2009;Huber et al 2009;Mosser et al 2010) and its underlying physical origin has been explained recently by Belkacem et al (2011). For the rms brightness fluctuation σ, the observations show that σ roughly scales as (ν max ) −1/2 (Mathur et al 2011;Chaplin et al 2011b).…”
Section: Theoretical Scaling Relationsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brown et al (1991) and Kjeldsen & Bedding (1995) have conjectured that ν max scales as the star cutoff frequency, ν c ∝ g/ √ T eff . This relation was shown to work for a larger variety of stars (Bedding & Kjeldsen 2003;Stello et al 2009;Huber et al 2009;Mosser et al 2010) and its underlying physical origin has been explained recently by Belkacem et al (2011). For the rms brightness fluctuation σ, the observations show that σ roughly scales as (ν max ) −1/2 (Mathur et al 2011;Chaplin et al 2011b).…”
Section: Theoretical Scaling Relationsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…(21) was obtained according to the relation σ 2 = C 2 bol H g /τ eff /4, where C bol is a bolometric correction that scales for the Kepler bandpass as C bol = (T eff /T 0 ) α , where T 0 = 5934 K and α = 0.8 (Ballot et al 2011, see also Michel et al 2009).…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this we use a power law B a (ν) = P a ν e a . To obtain the best fit we have followed the same procedure as in Ballot et al (2011b). The results of the fit are τ g (s) = 1112 ± 21, σ g = 102.2 ± 0.5 ppm, and α g = 2.41 ± 0.02.…”
Section: Background Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are more interested in the total background signal (or so to say a proxy for the total energy) locally around ν max and therefore have to merge the two individual amplitudes to a single value that can be compared to other observations or model predictions. This is straightforward and we define the total bolometric intensity fluctuation due to granulation as A 2 gran = C 2 bol (a 2 1 + a 2 2 ), where C bol is a bolometric correction that scales for the Kepler bandpass as C bol = (T eff /T 0 ) α , where T 0 = 5934 K and α = 0.8 (Ballot et al 2011;Michel et al 2009). The estimated uncertainties of ±250 K in T eff typically add about 1-2% uncertainty to A gran , which are then about 7% on average.…”
Section: Intensity Fluctuation a Granmentioning
confidence: 99%