2021
DOI: 10.3390/jimaging7090176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visible and Thermal Image-Based Trunk Detection with Deep Learning for Forestry Mobile Robotics

Abstract: Mobile robotics in forests is currently a hugely important topic due to the recurring appearance of forest wildfires. Thus, in-site management of forest inventory and biomass is required. To tackle this issue, this work presents a study on detection at the ground level of forest tree trunks in visible and thermal images using deep learning-based object detection methods. For this purpose, a forestry dataset composed of 2895 images was built and made publicly available. Using this dataset, five models were trai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing with the methodologies used for broken corn detection at a conveyor belt of a corn harvester based on different YOLO v3 models [15], the proposed YOLO v4 According to the performance of YOLO v4, it achieved a good balance between precision, recall, F1-score and speed which could be considered as the best model for sugar beet damage detection during harvesting. This finding is in line with reported studies that the YOLO networks could achieve higher speed and better overall performance e.g., [31,33,36]. Furthermore, our finding is in agreement with [37] who reported that YOLO models achieved higher speed and F1-score compared with SVM, Faster R-CNN for apple surface defect detection.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparing with the methodologies used for broken corn detection at a conveyor belt of a corn harvester based on different YOLO v3 models [15], the proposed YOLO v4 According to the performance of YOLO v4, it achieved a good balance between precision, recall, F1-score and speed which could be considered as the best model for sugar beet damage detection during harvesting. This finding is in line with reported studies that the YOLO networks could achieve higher speed and better overall performance e.g., [31,33,36]. Furthermore, our finding is in agreement with [37] who reported that YOLO models achieved higher speed and F1-score compared with SVM, Faster R-CNN for apple surface defect detection.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this study, the YOLO v4 model shows better performance compared to the other developed networks. This finding is in line with previous studies conducted for detection of citrus in an orchard [30], apples in a farming complex environment [31], pests [32] and tree trunks in a forest [33]. However, the Faster R-CNN NAS model shows lower performance in this research.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system was tested in a simulated and in a real environment: in the simulated environment, the UAV concluded 85% of the test flights without collisions, and in the real environment, the UAV concluded all test flights without collisions. Other studies focused on detecting tree trunks in street images using Deep Learning methods [29,30], in dense forests using visible and thermal imagery combined with Deep Learning [31], and even on the detection of stumps in harvested forests [32] to enhance the surrounding awareness of the operators and to endow machines with intelligent object avoidance systems.…”
Section: Vision-based Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health and diseases Offline [4-8] Inventory and structure Offline [9-23] Navigation Online [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] The aim of the "Health and diseases" category is to monitor the health of forest lands and detect the existence of diseases that affect forest trees, destroying some forest cultures and ecosystems. Data from this category are most of the times processed offline-the data are collected in the field and are processed later.…”
Section: Category Processing Type Workmentioning
confidence: 99%