1988
DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90226-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual estimates of percent diameter coronary stenosis: “A battered gold standard”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its limitations, coronary angiography remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of coronary disease [10][11][12][13]. One may therefore assume that coronary angiog raphy has a sensitivity and specificity of 100%.…”
Section: Conditional Probability Analysis and Clinical Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its limitations, coronary angiography remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of coronary disease [10][11][12][13]. One may therefore assume that coronary angiog raphy has a sensitivity and specificity of 100%.…”
Section: Conditional Probability Analysis and Clinical Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the visual method still represents the most widely used technique for assessing coronary stenosis severity [8,9,20,22,23,27], it introduces an additional level of subjectivity in data analysis, and represents a source of bias, as the use of a rough percent diameter narrowing ignores the full geometric impact of a stenosis on coronary blood flow [33]. Therefore, the true significance of these results needs be confirmed by studies using computer-assisted quantitation of luminal narrowings.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Variability among observers exists in assigning the degree of stenosis. 36 and no consensus is present regarding the threshold for what constitutes a "significant" lesion. Furthermore, poor correlation exists with postmortem findings, and, most importantly, discordance with physiological assessment.…”
Section: Coronary Anatomy and Physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%