2021
DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual outcome and optical quality of a wavefront-engineered extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens

Abstract: By using a specific aberration profile, the Mini Well IOL provided good depth of focus and superior mesopic contrast sensitivity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…45 This lens yielded 2.0 D of pseudoaccommodation in clinical studies, but the change in the aberration profile of the central area was evident only when measured by ray tracing. 46–48 The mean DIFFref was −0.33 D and −0.09 D in the 2 available studies. 46,47…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…45 This lens yielded 2.0 D of pseudoaccommodation in clinical studies, but the change in the aberration profile of the central area was evident only when measured by ray tracing. 46–48 The mean DIFFref was −0.33 D and −0.09 D in the 2 available studies. 46,47…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[46][47][48] The mean DIFFref was À0.33 D and À0.09 D in the 2 available studies. 46,47 So far, there are no reports about the comparison between automated refraction and clinical refraction with MonoEDOF IOLs. However, we have information about their profile, confirming slight changes in the central anterior surface, and we know that even minor decentration affects the optical result when measured at the optical bench.…”
Section: Automated Refraction and Edof Iolsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…30,34,36 The EDOF IOLs led to increased occurrence of halos and glare at similar contrast sensitivities. 21,25,30,34 Our study limitations include the small sample size and the different mean age. A longer follow-up would be preferable because of neuro-adaption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] To overcome these disturbances, manufacturers have developed nondiffractive EDoF IOLs. 1,6 Nondiffractive IOLs are most suitable for patients who would benefit from fewer optical phenomena and do not necessarily desire spectacle independence. 7 Conversely, diffractive multifocal IOLs offer more spectacle independence but with increased optical phenomena in some patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%