1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0733-8619(18)30312-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visually Evoked Potentials and Electroretinography in Neurologic Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Weinstein et al 21 have demonstrated that the central 21 of the macula accounts for approximately 65% of the response in the occipital cortex, suggesting that the spatial detail of the central visual field is poorly represented by conventional pattern. Moreover, pattern reversal VEP is also subjected to wide intersubject variability, and therefore we hypothesized that mfVEP might be more suitable for assessment of macular dysfunction.…”
Section: 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weinstein et al 21 have demonstrated that the central 21 of the macula accounts for approximately 65% of the response in the occipital cortex, suggesting that the spatial detail of the central visual field is poorly represented by conventional pattern. Moreover, pattern reversal VEP is also subjected to wide intersubject variability, and therefore we hypothesized that mfVEP might be more suitable for assessment of macular dysfunction.…”
Section: 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VEPs were calculated offline from the EEG signals according to published procedures and standards of a consensus group [15][16][17]. To quantify the typical peaks from the VEP waveform, the data from the 80 stimulations during a 40 s stimulation phase were averaged.…”
Section: Vep Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It examines the functional integrity of the retina, including the status of the rods and cones in the outer retina [1,2], and associated pathways in the middle and inner retina layers [3]. Although the examination has existed for many decades as a routine diagnostic method in clinical ophthalmology, there has been a delay in establishing a global standard in how the examination is carried out [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%