2002
DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.97.7.1541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitric Compositions in the Onaping Formation and Their Relationship to the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Sudbury Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High temperature reaction zones generally contain the assemblage actinolite-hornblendeclinopyroxene and epidote. In the large Sudbury impact crater, regional, vertically stacked alteration zones occur with increasing depth and paleo-temperatures (up to 250-300 °C) in the impact crater fill sequence (Ames et al 1998(Ames et al , 2002b. Alteration of the Yax-1 core characterized by Mgsaponite, K-montmorillonite, celadonite, Fe-oxides, and Kfeldspar is typical of low-temperature (0-150 °C) seawater recharge zones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High temperature reaction zones generally contain the assemblage actinolite-hornblendeclinopyroxene and epidote. In the large Sudbury impact crater, regional, vertically stacked alteration zones occur with increasing depth and paleo-temperatures (up to 250-300 °C) in the impact crater fill sequence (Ames et al 1998(Ames et al , 2002b. Alteration of the Yax-1 core characterized by Mgsaponite, K-montmorillonite, celadonite, Fe-oxides, and Kfeldspar is typical of low-temperature (0-150 °C) seawater recharge zones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The massive sulfide deposits indicate focused hydrothermal venting at 200-250 °C, while the exhalites that are in part carbonate-facies iron formation indicate lower temperature but extensive, diffuse low temperature venting over large areas (Ames et al 1998(Ames et al , 2000(Ames et al , 2002a. The sulfide deposits of the Sudbury crater floor vent systems are a modest economic resource at 6.4 Mt (Ames et al 2002b), however the magmatic Ni-Cu and magmatic-hydrothermal Cu-PGE deposits that developed at the base of the Sudbury melt sheet comprise the largest mineral deposits in the world (e.g., Naldrett 2003).…”
Section: Crater Floor Hydrothermal Vents and Massive Sulfide Deposits?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geology is described in detail in the volume edited by Pye et al (1984). The Sudbury Igneous Complex formed from a meteorite impact, which flash-melted the Archaen and Proterozoic crust resulting in its distinctive continental isotopic signature (Faggart et al, 1985) and andesitic bulk composition (Ames et al, 2002). The melt sheet differentiated to form norite in the Lower Unit, an oxide-rich quartz gabbro (<10% Fe-oxide and apatite) in the Middle Unit and granophyre of granitic composition in the Upper Unit (e.g., Gasparrini and Naldrett, 1972;Therriault et al, 2002).…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The (Pt + Pd)/IPGE Normalization to bulk continental crust, using values from Rudnick and Gao (2003), is appropriate for magnetite from Sudbury as the initial Sudbury melt was bulk continental crust in composition (Ames et al, 2002). Elements which are not significantly above detection limit are not plotted.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned previously, this would result in a melt replete with marginally corroded mafic xenoliths. Moreover, the decrease in temperature of the impact melt likely caused, at least locally, a relative increase in the volume of assimilated leucocratic rocks or felsic partial melts and Meldrum et al (1997), 1b: Ostermann (1996 and Prevec (1993), 2a: Cartier Granite after Meldrum et al (1997), 2b: Ramsey Algoman Complex after Prevec (1993), 3a: Lightfoot and Naldrett (1996), 3b: Ames et al (2002), 3c: this study (see Table 2), 3d: Mourre (2000), 4: Jolly et al (1992), 5a : Jolly et al (1992), 5b: Prevec (1993), 6a: Lightfoot and Naldrett (1996), 6b: Ostermann (1996), 6c: Prevec (1993, 6d: Sudbury Gabbro by Lightfoot and Farrow (2002), 6e: Sudbury Gabbro as amphibolite inclusion in Worthington Offset Dike Farrow 2002), 7: Ostermann (1996), 8a and 9a: McLennan (1985, 1995) and McLennan (2001), 8b and 9b: Rudnick andGao (2003), 10: Lightfoot et al (1997a), Wood and Spray (1998), Murphy and Spray (2002), Tuchscherer andSpray (2002), 11: Lightfoot et al (1997a), Lightfoot and Farrow (2002), Mourre (2000), 12a, 13a and 14a: Therriault et al (2002), 12b and 13b: Lightfoot et al (1997b), 14b: Felsic Norite by Lightfoot et al (1997b), 15a: Least altered vitric composition of Onaping Formation after Ames et al (2002), 15b: Ostermann (1996. thus, to a shift towards less mafic compositions of the basal melt layer.…”
Section: Emplacement Of the Worthington Dikementioning
confidence: 99%