2016 11th International Design &Amp; Test Symposium (IDT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/idt.2016.7843025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vivado HLS-based implementation of a fall detection decision core on an FPGA platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final design consumes lower LUT resources than [67,68], and final optimised design in [47] with 17.63%, 18.43% and 26.29% of the LUT resource consumption of the designs, respectively. While our final design consumes higher LUT resources at 167% and 292% of [50,51] respectively, but has 10% higher sensitivity and 2.9% higher specificity than both the designs. The first design iteration design I of our proposed system can be utilised for low area/resource consumption and consumes the second lowest LUT resources of all the designs in Table 7 with only [51] consuming 2% less resources.…”
Section: Hardware System Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The final design consumes lower LUT resources than [67,68], and final optimised design in [47] with 17.63%, 18.43% and 26.29% of the LUT resource consumption of the designs, respectively. While our final design consumes higher LUT resources at 167% and 292% of [50,51] respectively, but has 10% higher sensitivity and 2.9% higher specificity than both the designs. The first design iteration design I of our proposed system can be utilised for low area/resource consumption and consumes the second lowest LUT resources of all the designs in Table 7 with only [51] consuming 2% less resources.…”
Section: Hardware System Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…While our final design consumes higher LUT resources at 167% and 292% of [50,51] respectively, but has 10% higher sensitivity and 2.9% higher specificity than both the designs. The first design iteration design I of our proposed system can be utilised for low area/resource consumption and consumes the second lowest LUT resources of all the designs in Table 7 with only [51] consuming 2% less resources. Design II also consumes low resources in Table 7 with [51] consuming 10.9% less resources.…”
Section: Hardware System Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations