1981
DOI: 10.1109/tc.1981.1675776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VLSI Performance Comparison of Banyan and Crossbar Communications Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, crossbar switch network has been studied by a number of researchers including Franklin [10] and Mudge [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, crossbar switch network has been studied by a number of researchers including Franklin [10] and Mudge [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With banyan structure only a unique path exists between an input-output pair, in which the network is degraded as a blocking one. As shown in [5] [6], the blocking probability of banyan networks is usually very high. For example, the blocking probability for a 256×256 banyan network can be as high as 0.65 (at full load condition), even without any crosstalk constraint.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related performance measure is the blocking probability of a network over all permutation requests, as defined above. Franklin has presented simulation results for the blocking probability of banyan networks (built with 2 x 2 switches) under the assumption of permutation requests [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%