2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vocal Attractiveness Increases by Averaging

Abstract: Vocal attractiveness has a profound influence on listeners-a bias known as the "what sounds beautiful is good" vocal attractiveness stereotype [1]-with tangible impact on a voice owner's success at mating, job applications, and/or elections. The prevailing view holds that attractive voices are those that signal desirable attributes in a potential mate [2-4]-e.g., lower pitch in male voices. However, this account does not explain our preferences in more general social contexts in which voices of both genders ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

12
144
6
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
12
144
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Amusic deficits in prosody perception remain controversial (30,37), but our results suggest other domains where amusics and normal listeners may differ. Voice attractiveness, for instance, is positively correlated with the degree of harmonicity (52). Harmonicity is also an important cue for concurrent sound segregation (53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amusic deficits in prosody perception remain controversial (30,37), but our results suggest other domains where amusics and normal listeners may differ. Voice attractiveness, for instance, is positively correlated with the degree of harmonicity (52). Harmonicity is also an important cue for concurrent sound segregation (53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies do not mention the range of their sample durations, and the studies that mention them reveal substantial variations between experiments. For example, the vowel duration was 250 -380 ms (mean 0 290 ms) in Collins and Missing (2003), 640 ms on average in Feinberg, Jones, Little, et al (2005), and 201 -477 ms in Bruckert et al (2010). Studies using sentences also sometimes have mentioned the average duration, but only for information purposes (e.g., Lander, 2008;Puts, Apicella, & Cárdenas, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still others use monophthong vowel sounds (e.g., /a/ and /i/ in English). These stimuli are most common in studies on voice preference (Bruckert et al, 2010;Collins, 2000;Feinberg, Jones, DeBruine, et al, 2005;Ferdenzi, Lemaître, Leongómez, & Roberts, 2011). The use of vowels is beneficial in two regards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La question de l'esthétique de la voix parlée suscite un intérêt grandissant dans la communauté des chercheurs en parole et des professionnels de la voix -phoniatres et orthophonistes -impliqués dans les processus de rééducation vocale (Bruckert et al, 2010, Liu & Wu, 2011. Ceci s'explique, entre autres, par le fait que la voix est un outil de communication et d'interactions sociales qui influe fortement sur l'image qu'un individu peut avoir de son interlocuteur.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified