Vocalising Violence

Bellini, Rosanna; Rainey, Jay; Garbett, Andrew; Briggs, Pam

doi:10.1145/3328320.3328405

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous deployments of Gabber make no distinction in how participants can contribute to stages of engagements, in order to support flexible participation [7,64]. The authors found that this discouraged engagement, and required intervention from researchers to guide the process.…”

Section: Configuring Workflow Stages With Rolesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This design goal aimed to support alternative modes of participation in the capture, analysis, and reporting stages of a community engagement. Although Gabber was designed to facilitate participation across the qualitative workflow, it had not yet been used in distributed engagements [7,64]. Consequently, role-based activities were introduced to support participation with these qualitative practices.…”

Section: Dg1: Provide Alternative Modes Of Participationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Community engagements are processes to involve participants in activities aimed to generate insights and information, usually for decision-making [35]. Examples include local governments engaging with their citizens [15,50,51], NGOs engaging their members (as in this paper and [6,21,24,59]), or businesses engaging staff [7,22,56]. In all cases, such community engagements typically mirror qualitative research processes -e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

TalkFutures

Rainey

Vega

Richardson

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Community engagements are qualitative processes that make use of participants local knowledge for democratic decisionmaking, but often exclude participants from data analysis and dissemination. This can mean that they are left feeling that their voice is not properly represented in the final output. This paper presents a digital community engagement process, Talk-Futures, that actively involves participants in the production, distributed analysis and summarization of qualitative data. The design of TalkFutures was explored through a five-week deployment with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) as part of a consultation designed to inform future strategy. Our analysis of deployment metrics and post-deployment interviews outline how TalkFutures: (i) increased modes of participation across the qualitative workflow; (ii) reduced barriers to participation; and (iii) improved representation in the engagement processes.

show abstract

Section: Configuring Workflow Stages With Rolesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Dg1: Provide Alternative Modes Of Participationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

TalkFutures

Rainey

Vega

Richardson

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Utilizing Participant Voice in Volunteer Training

Varghese

Rainey

Montague

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Delivering training to volunteers is a huge challenge for nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Traditional classroombased approaches that dominate training are problematic due to the limited participation they offer to trainees. Peer-led approaches however, have shown promise in helping NGOs utilize trainee experiences within training. Although technologies are playing an increasing role in training, their benefits are not well understood. We describe our experience of designing peer-led training for community volunteers in rural India. Working alongside an NGO involved in community regeneration and social action, we collaboratively delivered a ten-day training workshop, deploying audio technologies to engage the participants in sharing lived experiences. We draw on reflections from trainers and trainees on how utilizing participant voice can enhance training. We highlight opportunities around the usage of audio technologies for engaging with participant voice, including the ability to reclaim trainee agency within training and to work within cultural barriers.

show abstract