Volumetric modulated arc therapy is superior to conventional intensity modulated radiotherapy - a comparison among prostate cancer patients treated in an Australian centre

Abstract

BackgroundRadiotherapy technology is expanding rapidly. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technologies such as RapidArc® (RA) may be a more efficient way of delivering intensity-modulated radiotherapy-like (IM) treatments. This study is an audit of the RA experience in an Australian department with a planning and economic comparison to IM.Methods30 consecutive prostate cancer patients treated radically with RA were analyzed. Eight RA patients treated definitively were then completely re-planned with 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D); and a conventional sliding window IM technique; and a new RA plan. The acceptable plans and their treatment times were compared and analyzed for any significant difference. Differences in staff costs of treatment were computed and analyzed.ResultsThirty patients had been treated to date with eight being treated definitely to at least 74 Gy, nine post high dose brachytherapy (HDR) to 50.4Gy and 13 post prostatectomy to at least 64Gy. All radiotherapy courses were completed with no breaks. Acute rectal toxicity by the RTOG criteria was acceptable with 22 having no toxicity, seven with grade 1 and one had grade 2.Of the eight re-planned patients, none of the 3D (three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy) plans were acceptable based on local guidelines for dose to organs at risk. There was no statistically significant difference in planning times between IM and RA (p = 0.792). IM had significantly greater MUs per fraction (1813.9 vs 590.2 p < 0.001), total beam time per course (5.2 vs 3.1 hours, p = 0.001) and average treatment staff cost per patient radiotherapy course ($AUD489.91 vs $AUD315.66, p = 0.001). The mean saving in treatment staff cost for RA treatment was $AUD174.25 per patient.Conclusions3D was incapable of covering a modern radiotherapy volume for the radical treatment of prostate cancer. These volumes can be treated via conventional IM and RA. RA was significantly more efficient, safe and cost effective than IM. VMAT technologies are a superior way of delivering IM-like treatments.

Hippocampal avoidance with volumetric modulated arc therapy in melanoma brain metastases – the first Australian experience

“…This compares well with Hsu et al [22]. This treatment therefore saves machine time when compared even to other conformal techniques, as has been found in other tumour sites [15]. More importantly, VMAT minimises time spent at hospital with the single planning session and short daily fraction time.…”

“…The recent introduction of VMAT has therefore allowed the expansion of conformal techniques to more cases including palliative scenarios [15]. VMAT has enabled WBRT with hippocampal avoidance (WBRTHA), with simultaneous Integrated boost (SIB) to regions of macroscopic tumour, all within the one radiotherapy course.…”

Estimating the Costs of Intensity-Modulated and 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in Ontario

“…In the start-up scenario, the incremental cost of imrt increased by a factor of about 11 ($4,268 rather than the $381 estimated for a mature program), which highlights the importance of evaluation timing. In most ceas, cost estimates based on a mature program are more appropriate, because it takes less than 1 year for a centre to become familiar with the technique 24 .…”

Common dermatology questions and answers about the radiation treatment of skin cancer in the modern era

“…External beam RT (EBRT) for skin cancer has recently been revolutionised by the adoption of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), which is the newest stage in the evolution of intensity modulated RT (IMRT). 35 Tangential VMAT (TVMAT) is ideal for scalps. 17 VMAT is essentially the application of computed tomography technology to RT and can treat large fields of skin quickly and accurately with great conformality that is without overdosing surrounding dose-sensitive normal tissues.…”