2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voluntary versus mechanically-induced deep inspiration breath-hold for left breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 14 Veken et al who investigated the effect of mechanical ventilator-assisted DIBH reported an MHD of 1.3 Gy and a maximum LAD dose of 7.7 Gy which was significantly reduced compared with conventional surface-guided DIBH. 15 Similarly, other studies using CPAP-DIBH, conducted by Reckhow et al reported an MHD of 2.5 Gy. 18 Despite separately analyzing CPAP and DIBH, our study achieved lower dosimetric outcomes, which can be explained by the fact that our study used VMAT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 14 Veken et al who investigated the effect of mechanical ventilator-assisted DIBH reported an MHD of 1.3 Gy and a maximum LAD dose of 7.7 Gy which was significantly reduced compared with conventional surface-guided DIBH. 15 Similarly, other studies using CPAP-DIBH, conducted by Reckhow et al reported an MHD of 2.5 Gy. 18 Despite separately analyzing CPAP and DIBH, our study achieved lower dosimetric outcomes, which can be explained by the fact that our study used VMAT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“… 14 More recently, Veken et al compared the positional reproducibility and dosimetric outcomes of CPAP-enhanced DIBH with surface-guided DIBH in a randomized controlled trial and determined that CPAP-assisted DIBH is non-inferior to surface-guided DIBH. 15 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%