VP63.09: Elastography for the assessment of gynecological pathology:a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

or more fibroids. Mean size of the fibroids was 23.7 mm (range 14-37 mm). All fibroids were type 2 (FIGO) except one type 0 and one type 1. Hysterosonography and hysteroscopic score was 4.22 in both groups with no statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). Hysterosonography score was low (group I) in 4 patients (44.4%) and intermediate (group II) in 5 women (55.5%), ranging from 1-6. Hysterosocopy score was identical but ranging from 0-6. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups (p < 0.001). Hysterosonography prediction of complexity was well correlated with hysteroscopy except for one case. Conclusions: 3D Hysterosonography is a good diagnostic tool for evaluating submucosal fibroids that can help in the decision-making of these patients. Hysterosonography can be used to predict the complexity of hysteroscopic resection of fibroids. More studies are needed to confirm these findings. VP63.08 Ultrasonographic parameters predicting the improvement of postmenstrual spotting in patients undergoing hysteroscopic treatment of isthmocele