2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-022-01509-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability assessment and collapse simulation of unreinforced masonry structures subjected to sequential ground motions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22,23 Using more advanced damage measures, such as those capable of combining both displacement-and energy-based measures 24 Reinhorn and Valles 25 ; Chung et al 26 ; Remki et al 27 , in place of simple displacement-based ones seems a legitimate and more practical solution. [28][29][30] Among other damage measures, several studies showed the better performance of Park and Ang damage index 24 for assessing cumulative damage in URM buildings [31][32][33] in comparison with displacement-based damage measures. These damage indices, however, were originally developed for frame structures or RC members, and therefore, as is their application for URM buildings is questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 Using more advanced damage measures, such as those capable of combining both displacement-and energy-based measures 24 Reinhorn and Valles 25 ; Chung et al 26 ; Remki et al 27 , in place of simple displacement-based ones seems a legitimate and more practical solution. [28][29][30] Among other damage measures, several studies showed the better performance of Park and Ang damage index 24 for assessing cumulative damage in URM buildings [31][32][33] in comparison with displacement-based damage measures. These damage indices, however, were originally developed for frame structures or RC members, and therefore, as is their application for URM buildings is questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches are very popular in civil and earthquake engineering research, and they have been used by many researchers [20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Moreover, the recent advances in uncertainties regarding the sensitivity analysis of global structural parameters (especially for masonry structures) can be accessed in [27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 16. Macro continuum model-based analyses: (a) tensile damage for a perforated URM shear wall[170], (b) crack pattern for a confined URM shear wall[183], (c) damage distribution for a largescale URM shear wall[169], (d) damage distributions of a URM building under sequential ground motions (the plots from to left to right are corresponding to the cases: end of the mainshock, aftershock at 20.75 s, aftershock at 22.50 s, and aftershock at 24.25 s)[187].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%