2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability assessment methods for rocking and overturning of free standing elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2021, 24 and Berto et al. 2018, 35 among others. The outcomes of the present experimental study show that PGV/PGA may lead to rocking initiation.…”
Section: Further Investigations On the Experimental Outcomes For The ...mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2021, 24 and Berto et al. 2018, 35 among others. The outcomes of the present experimental study show that PGV/PGA may lead to rocking initiation.…”
Section: Further Investigations On the Experimental Outcomes For The ...mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Fragility curves were derived analytically and then compared to the experimental results. Similar approaches for assessing experimentally typical freestanding building contents were also adopted by Petrone et al, 34 Berto et al, 35 Di Sarno et al, 36 and D'Angela et al 37 Additional shake-table tests carried out by Berto et al 38 provided experimental evidence that rocking may occur for acceleration lower than the value generally assumed as the rocking limit, which is proportional, by acceleration gravity, to the aspect ratio. A different threshold value of acceleration was proposed to define a safe acceleration limit for seismic vulnerability assessment of freestanding elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…30 Based on the available shaking table test data, four methods for seismic rocking and overturning fragility assessment of freestanding blocks were compared. 31 The experimental overturning fragility curves of three prismatic blocks with different slenderness ratios under bidirectional ground motions were generated. 32 Rocking and overturning fragility of the hospital cabinets and rocking fragility of the inside contents were assessed based on the experimental data.…”
Section: Noveltymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometrical imperfections were found to slightly increase the rocking and overturning probabilities of slender rigid blocks under artificial seismic horizontal bidirectional signals in a narrow range of peak ground acceleration (PGA) 30 . Based on the available shaking table test data, four methods for seismic rocking and overturning fragility assessment of freestanding blocks were compared 31 . The experimental overturning fragility curves of three prismatic blocks with different slenderness ratios under bidirectional ground motions were generated 32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), passive devices are generally placed at the base. Some researchers investigated the use of double concave curved surface sliders for marble sculptures [7], statues [8,9] and busts [10]. In case of multiple art objects exhibited in museums, others proposed base isolated floors consisting in double friction pendulum isolators that allow protecting more objects with structural optimization and saving of resources [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%