2020
DOI: 10.1080/21680566.2020.1828197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

W/CDM-MSFM-driven pedestrian path prediction at signalized crosswalk with mixed traffic flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OR "automated driving" OR "connected autonomous vehicle*" OR "CAVs") AND ("mix* traffic*" OR "heterogeneous traffic*" OR "mix* traffic flow")) AND 2-s2.0-85101020669 Modeling pedestrians road crossing [90] 2-s2.0-85099345593 Review paper [91] 2-s2.0-85092091552 Pedestrian path prediction at signalized crosswalk [92] 2-s2.0-85106318730 Key focus was connected buses and energy consumption [93] 2-s2.0-85097173824 Survey-based study about user perceptions [94] 2-s2.0-85093119962 User perception based on autonomous shuttle rides-user survey [95] 2-s2.0-85086721434 User perception based on autonomous shuttle rides-user survey [96] 2-s2.0-85076820374 Estimating pedestrian's waiting time at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks [97] 2-s2.0-85074453871 Pedestrians' perspective [98] 2-s2.0-85069684311 Vehicle-pedestrian encountering [99] 2-s2.0-85031293900 Review paper discussing future perspectives of AVs [100] 2-s2.0-85106204730 Prior focus was communication from in-vehicle and from infrastructure signage.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…OR "automated driving" OR "connected autonomous vehicle*" OR "CAVs") AND ("mix* traffic*" OR "heterogeneous traffic*" OR "mix* traffic flow")) AND 2-s2.0-85101020669 Modeling pedestrians road crossing [90] 2-s2.0-85099345593 Review paper [91] 2-s2.0-85092091552 Pedestrian path prediction at signalized crosswalk [92] 2-s2.0-85106318730 Key focus was connected buses and energy consumption [93] 2-s2.0-85097173824 Survey-based study about user perceptions [94] 2-s2.0-85093119962 User perception based on autonomous shuttle rides-user survey [95] 2-s2.0-85086721434 User perception based on autonomous shuttle rides-user survey [96] 2-s2.0-85076820374 Estimating pedestrian's waiting time at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks [97] 2-s2.0-85074453871 Pedestrians' perspective [98] 2-s2.0-85069684311 Vehicle-pedestrian encountering [99] 2-s2.0-85031293900 Review paper discussing future perspectives of AVs [100] 2-s2.0-85106204730 Prior focus was communication from in-vehicle and from infrastructure signage.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%