“…It seeks to assess people’s perception of 67 items, organized into nine subscales representing land-use mix diversity, neighborhood recreation facilities, residential density, land-use mix-access, street connectivity, walking/cycling facilities, neighborhood aesthetics, pedestrian and road traffic safety, and crime safety ( 69 ). Perez Barbosa et al ( 33 ), Adlakha et al ( 34 ), Adlakha and Parra ( 38 ), Panter et al ( 41 ), Stefansdottir ( 61 ), Collins et al ( 62 ), Koohsari et al ( 63 , 64 ), McCormack et al ( 65 ), Brüchert et al ( 66 ), Pimenta et al ( 67 ), Sun et al ( 68 ), Noonan et al ( 69 ), Algoday et al ( 70 ), Amini et al ( 71 ), Borchardt et al ( 72 ), Cain et al ( 73 ), Cerin et al ( 74 , 75 ), Crane et al ( 76 ), Delisle Nyström et al ( 77 ), Fitch et al ( 78 ), Fortune et al ( 79 ), Jeon et al ( 80 ), Kärmeniemi et al ( 81 ), Kartschmit et al ( 82 ), Kriit et al ( 83 ), Lee ( 84 ), Levasseur et al ( 85 ), Mäki-Opas et al ( 86 ), Marquet and Miralles-Guasch ( 87 ), Mohsen and Ahmadieh ( 88 ), Mouratidis ( 89 ), Nordh et al ( 90 ), Oliver et al ( 91 ), Sallis et al ( 92 ), Su et al ( 93 ), Tewahade et al ( 94 ), Yang and Zhou ( 95 ), Yang et al ( 96 ), and Žaltauskė and Petrauskienė ( 97 ) analyzed the associations among built environment characteristics, AT use, and health aspects.…”