1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1992.tb04240.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wart, Keratoacanthoma, and Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Spectrum of the Same Neoplastic Process?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If KA are truly able to form metastasis is still a matter of debate, in contrast with SCC which metastasize in up to 5% (83,84). As reported, these metastasizing KA could have been misdiagnosed as KA but are true SCC (5,8,69,76,78,(85)(86)(87). In fact 10% as KA diagnosed tumors are malignant and progressing SCC (9,69).…”
Section: Regressionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If KA are truly able to form metastasis is still a matter of debate, in contrast with SCC which metastasize in up to 5% (83,84). As reported, these metastasizing KA could have been misdiagnosed as KA but are true SCC (5,8,69,76,78,(85)(86)(87). In fact 10% as KA diagnosed tumors are malignant and progressing SCC (9,69).…”
Section: Regressionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…18,22 Other reports propose that similar to actinic keratoses, KAs may belong to a spectrum of premalignant lesions that can transform into SCCs over time. 23 Overall, many still consider the two lesions as distinct entities whose overlapping features lead to common diagnostic confusion. [24][25][26][27] To date, studies to definitively separate the two neoplasms based on histopathology, biomarkers, and biochemical or genetic studies have not been successful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Kern et al [15] showed that there are histological criteria which make it possible to differentiate between these two lesions in 80% of cases. Recently, Fujisawa et al [16] and Ledo [17] pointed out the usefulness of a flow cytometric method which measures the nucleus DNA content to distinguish between KA and SCC. Recently, Fujisawa et al [16] and Ledo [17] pointed out the usefulness of a flow cytometric method which measures the nucleus DNA content to distinguish between KA and SCC.…”
Section: Histologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty remains, however, that other authors try from the outset to include KA under the heading of lowmalignancy SCC [9]. Recently, Fujisawa et al [16] and Ledo [17] pointed out the usefulness of a flow cytometric method which measures the nucleus DNA content to distinguish between KA and SCC. Yet other authors mention the value of quantifying protein PSIOO [18], the value of keratinocyte differentiation markers [19], or the value of calculating the number of elastic fibres present in lesions [20].…”
Section: Histologymentioning
confidence: 99%