2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10666-013-9378-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wasteload Allocation Using Wastewater Treatment and Flow Augmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that in the conducted studies, the water quality processes in river systems were simulated with different simulation models such as QUAL2E (Burn and Yulianti, 2001;Parmar and Keshari, 2014;Saadatpour and Afshar, 2007), QUAL2K (Saadatpour et al, 2019), CE-QUAL (Afshar et al, 2018), WASP4 (Cardwell and Ellis, 1993), etc. These water quality simulation models have been combined with both heuristic and deterministic optimization approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in the conducted studies, the water quality processes in river systems were simulated with different simulation models such as QUAL2E (Burn and Yulianti, 2001;Parmar and Keshari, 2014;Saadatpour and Afshar, 2007), QUAL2K (Saadatpour et al, 2019), CE-QUAL (Afshar et al, 2018), WASP4 (Cardwell and Ellis, 1993), etc. These water quality simulation models have been combined with both heuristic and deterministic optimization approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To develop the best allocation strategy under new topological conditions, a WLRA model may couple an optimization algorithm with a physical water quality simulation model. Application of deterministic waste load allocation (WLA) models have been reported by Takyi and Lence (1999), Burn and Yulianti (2001), and, recently, Parmar and Keshari (2014). Fuzzy concepts and mathematics have widely been used to tackle the uncertainties in WLA models (Sasikumar and Mujumdar 2000;Ghosh and Mujumdar 2006;Saadatpour and Afshar 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%