2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.coesh.2021.100229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wastewater-based epidemiology, a tool to bridge biomarkers of exposure, contaminants, and human health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 12 Regardless of delays in WS data, lag or lead time of WS is determined by the onset, magnitude, and duration of shedding of virus particles, asymptomatic cases that are still actively shedding virus particles, and false negative and positive determinations, among others. 49 51 There are also biases and inaccuracies in clinical measures due to the timing or capacities of laboratories and the timing of releases of data, but it is also governed by the timing of the onset of symptoms as well as the willingness of persons to be tested. 7 , 20 , 55 57 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 12 Regardless of delays in WS data, lag or lead time of WS is determined by the onset, magnitude, and duration of shedding of virus particles, asymptomatic cases that are still actively shedding virus particles, and false negative and positive determinations, among others. 49 51 There are also biases and inaccuracies in clinical measures due to the timing or capacities of laboratories and the timing of releases of data, but it is also governed by the timing of the onset of symptoms as well as the willingness of persons to be tested. 7 , 20 , 55 57 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach requires the study of the human metabolism, identification of the substances excreted by urine, selection of those representative excreted in a high percentage, development of an analytical method able to determine them, study of their stability in wastewater and then, finally their assessment in wastewater. There are many remarkable and well conducted reviews that treat the topic of potential biomarkers to be used in the WBE for different estimations [ 15 , [24] , [25] , [26] ]. These reviews categorized biomarkers depending a little bit on the authors criterion but in all cases consumption, exposure, health/disease and lifestyle/consumption are main drivers of these classifications.…”
Section: Classification and Characteristics Of The Different Approaches To Identify Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be deduced from the previous paragraphs, WBE is completely multidisciplinary, including analysts, epidemiologists, microbiologists, sociologists, chemical engineers, economists, health specialists, etc. [ 24 ]. However, it is also true that it has a very strong analytical component, which we consider relevant and of special interest for the topic covered by this journal [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Most of the research efforts of WBE are concentrated in Europe. Originally, determining the population-wide use or misuse of illicit or therapeutic drugs, pharmaceuticals and personal care products, tobacco and alcohol use, pesticide exposure, 5 genetic biomarkers, 6 etc. was the main target of WBE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%