2011
DOI: 10.1002/tqem.20300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wastewater management in Lagos State: Moving toward a more sustainable approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to these costs, a lot of real property owners in Wielkopolska refuse to change the sewage collection and treatment systems . According to other authors, for similar economic reasons, the majority of developing countries avoid building centralized sewage systems .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Due to these costs, a lot of real property owners in Wielkopolska refuse to change the sewage collection and treatment systems . According to other authors, for similar economic reasons, the majority of developing countries avoid building centralized sewage systems .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Domestic wastewater, which contains human and industrial wastewater, including heavy metals and other substances, causes pollution and contamination. Untreated sewage and industrial effluent are typically dumped in the waterways and the Lagos lagoon (Asemota et al, 2011). Siyanbola et al (2011) studied effluent samples from five industries in the Ikeja and Ikorodu Lagos state.…”
Section: Scientific Literature and The Theoretical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dari beberapa teknologi pengolahan limbah yang tersedia, IPAL sanitasi taman (sanita atau constructed wetland) diajukan sebagai pilihan. Alasan yang mendasari adalah IPAL sanita sudah terbukti dapat mengurangi kadar polutan air Haryani et al, 2019), ramah lingkungan (Boufaroua et al, 2013), menggunakan prinsip fitoremediasi (Moenir, 2010;Suswati & Wibisono, 2013;Mustafa, 2013), relatif murah (Aryantie et al, 2018;Mustafa, 2013), dan dapat dikelola oleh komunitas masyarakat (Asemota et al, 2011;Bright-Davies et al, 2015). Teknologi ini terbukti berhasil diterapkan di permukiman (Fu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified
“…Kebijakan alternatif yang direkomendasikan untuk mengisi kekosongan pelayanan pengolahan air limbah domestik di kawasan permukiman Kota Depok adalah dengan menerapkan IPAL sanita (constructed wetland) (Fu et al, 2018) yang relatif murah (Aryantie et al, 2018;Mustafa, 2013) daripada teknologi biofilter (Yudo dan Said, 2017). IPAL sanita dapat menjangkau permukiman perkotaan dengan keterbatasan lahan dan http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/jwl.9.2.172-185 dapat dikelola secara mandiri oleh penduduk (Asemota et al, 2011;Bright-Davies et al, 2015). Skema kelembagaan yang meliputi lembaga, wewenang, dan pendanaan yang telah disarikan dalam penelitian sebagai rekomendasi pengelolaan IPAL sanita di tingkat pelaksana.…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified