Watching the grass grow: does recreational cannabis legalization affect retail and agricultural wages?

Abstract

Background Over the past several years, cannabis has become legal for recreational use in many US states and jurisdictions around the world. The opening of these markets has led to the establishment of hundreds of cannabis production and retail firms with accompanying demand for labor, leading to concerns about spillover effects on wages from incumbents. Methods We study the markets for agricultural and retail labor in Washington and Colorado from 2000 to 2019 using differences-in-differences with synthetic controls. We employ employment data from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, state-level demographic data from the US Census Bureau, and agricultural data from the National Agricultural Statistics Service. We use the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) for variable selection and classification and regression trees (CART) for chained imputation of missing values. Results We find little-to-no evidence of a significant difference in weekly wages per worker generated by cannabis legalization: the log of the weekly wage per worker decreases by 0.013 in Washington’s agricultural sector (p value 0.091) and increases by 0.059 in Washington’s retail sector (p value 0.606). Results in Colorado are qualitatively similar. These results are limited in part by the short post-legalization period of the data. Conclusions Cannabis legalization is unlikely to negatively impact incumbent agriculture or retail firms through the labor market channel.

From high school to higher education: Is recreational marijuana a consumption amenity for US college students?

“…Marijuana legalization's impact has been extensively studied across disciplines. These include health (Raman & Bradford, 2022; Sarvet et al., 2018), crime or substance abuse (Sabia et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2021), as well as income (Chakraborty et al., 2020; Dave et al., 2023; Jiang & Miller, 2022). Others have shown that students value some college amenities (i.e., student activities and sports) resulting in positive or negative effects on achievements (Jacob et al., 2018; Lindo et al., 2012; Webber & Ehrenberg, 2010).…”