1960
DOI: 10.2172/10156399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water plant modifications for increased production at B, C, D, DR, F, and H Reactors

Abstract: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5a. 15 The handling of the materials was done in a dry-box, flushed with dried nitrogen. However, the refluxing was done in the open, having a drying tube connected to the top of the condenser, protecting the reaction mixture from the atmospheric moisture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5a. 15 The handling of the materials was done in a dry-box, flushed with dried nitrogen. However, the refluxing was done in the open, having a drying tube connected to the top of the condenser, protecting the reaction mixture from the atmospheric moisture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with ψ = x 2 ǫ 3 /3 and k = α lσ , β lσ , we can combine the leading terms of the asymptotic expansion (14)- (15), and write it in the following compact form,…”
Section: Single Core-shell Particles With Thin Shellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is tempting to speculate that the DNAme machinery is directly targeted to such CGIs by PcG proteins (Schlesinger et al, 2007), the interplay between PcG proteins and DNAme is complex. Indeed, these repressive pathways generally act in a mutually exclusive manner, with DNAme clearly antagonizing the recruitment of PcG proteins at CGIs (Brinkman et al, 2012). Thus, those CGIs that show a gain of DNAme specifically in the ExE may be primed for de novo DNAme as a result of a closed chromatin state established by PcG proteins bound at these regions in earlier stages of embryonic development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%