2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-016-1328-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Resources Risk Assessment Model based on the Subjective and Objective Combination Weighting Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two main categories of weight assignment as subjective and objective. In the subjective weight assignment, the weights of relative importance of the parameters may be assigned based on the expert's preferences for the considered application, it has poor sense of interdependent criteria [36][37][38]. In the objective weight assignment, the weights of parameter's relative importance can be calculated by means of conventional statistical measures, it has poor sense of expert's preferences [33,34].…”
Section: Composite Risk Index For Irrigation Salinity Hazardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main categories of weight assignment as subjective and objective. In the subjective weight assignment, the weights of relative importance of the parameters may be assigned based on the expert's preferences for the considered application, it has poor sense of interdependent criteria [36][37][38]. In the objective weight assignment, the weights of parameter's relative importance can be calculated by means of conventional statistical measures, it has poor sense of expert's preferences [33,34].…”
Section: Composite Risk Index For Irrigation Salinity Hazardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the weighted attribute value, a mathematical model is established for the subjective and objective weighted attribute value consistency. Calculate the optimal solution of combination coefficients α and β, and then determine the combination weights of the evaluation criteria [34][35][36].…”
Section: The Combination Weighting Methods Based On the Subjective Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on grading criteria principles, statistical data on the provincial levels and grading criteria in widely accepted studies [11,24,25] are summarized in order to provide comparative references for our research area. Some grading criteria can be directly obtained from development plans of Shandong province [64].…”
Section: Procedures For Wrsu Assessment and Strategy Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grading criteria of indictors I1-I3, I6, I9-I10, I15 can be directly obtained from development plans of Shandong province. The rest are acquired according to grading criteria principles [63], grading criteria in existing studies [11,24,25] and statistical data on the provincial levels. Each indicator can be divided into 4 levels (I, II, III, IV) indicating "sustainable", "critical sustainable", "unsustainable", and "totally unsustainable" situations, respectively.…”
Section: Construction Of Wrsu Indicators and Strategy Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%