2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-016-2236-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Surface Profile Computation for Compound Channels with Narrow Flood Plains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the ANN model best agrees with the experimental data with high R 2 values. Figure 14 compares developed models for predicting water surface profile with the previous methods developed by Naik et al (2022) and Naik & Khatua (2016). It has been noticed that the constructed models are very close to the best-fitted line compared to previous methods and have a strong potential for generalization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the ANN model best agrees with the experimental data with high R 2 values. Figure 14 compares developed models for predicting water surface profile with the previous methods developed by Naik et al (2022) and Naik & Khatua (2016). It has been noticed that the constructed models are very close to the best-fitted line compared to previous methods and have a strong potential for generalization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Figure 3 represents the experimental setup and the types of equipment that were employed in the research. Figure 4 depicts a plan view of the nonprismatic cross-sections of Rezaei (2006), Naik & Khatua (2016), and the current channel. At the downstream end of the flume, a tailgate was installed to control the water surface profile and impose a specific flow depth in the flume portion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations