2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn48605.2020.9206832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet Denoising and Attention-based RNN- ARIMA Model to Predict Forex Price

Abstract: Every change of trend in the forex market presents a great opportunity as well as a risk for investors. Accurate forecasting of forex prices is a crucial element in any effective hedging or speculation strategy. However, the complex nature of the forex market makes the predicting problem challenging, which has prompted extensive research from various academic disciplines. In this paper, a novel approach that integrates the wavelet denoising, Attention-based Recurrent Neural Network (ARNN), and Autoregressive I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[27,35] It was clear that papers [24,57] achieved the best performance using the DNN model, having RMSEs smaller than 0.001. Papers [11,29,31,32,36,38,71,73] had great performance, while papers [27,35,37] did not have low RMSEs. Among all the papers, 33% of the CNN papers had an RMSE below 0.001, 33% of the CNN papers were in the range of 0.01-0.1, and 33% of the CNN papers were in the range of 0.1-1.…”
Section: Discussion and Analysis Based On Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[27,35] It was clear that papers [24,57] achieved the best performance using the DNN model, having RMSEs smaller than 0.001. Papers [11,29,31,32,36,38,71,73] had great performance, while papers [27,35,37] did not have low RMSEs. Among all the papers, 33% of the CNN papers had an RMSE below 0.001, 33% of the CNN papers were in the range of 0.01-0.1, and 33% of the CNN papers were in the range of 0.1-1.…”
Section: Discussion and Analysis Based On Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We found that paper [22] had the highest accuracy compared to any other papers, paper [16] had the highest return rate followed by papers [14,18,21]. Paper [24,31] had the lowest RMSE. Paper [19] had a higher F-measure than that of papers [14,18], but paper [18] achieved a higher Sharpe ratio than that of paper [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations