Wealth to well being-A comparative study of brics peers with reference to SEDA framework

Mukherjee, Pallabi; Ahuja, Kanhaiya

doi:10.5958/2249-7315.2017.00447.6

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is more critical than ever that policymakers adopt and enforce policies to take this disruption into account and strive to improve the lives of people. In terms of their sustainable development ratings, Mukherjee and Ahuja (2017) align the BRICS nations and also confirm Russia and Brazil to top the table.…”

Section: Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 67%

Connecting Growth with Development and Income with Sustainability, Education, and Employment of Global Powerhouses - A SEDA Perspective

2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: This paper aims to depict the recent initiation to evaluate the efficiency of a nation in converting wealth to well-being in terms of Sustainable Economic Development Assessment scores (SEDA) specially analyzed for the global powerhouse countries accommodating 78% of the world’ population and 87% of countries income.Design/Methodology/Approach: SEDA (Sustainable Economic Development Assessment) measures sustainable development with three broad dimensions: economic, sustainability, and environment. The analysis is carried out by plotting a four-quadrant matrix chart to compare some macro-economic fundamentals.Countries Considered: 36 Powerhouse countries of the world (78% of the world’s population and 87% of countries’ income).Variables Considered: GDP/Capita, Wealth to well-being coefficient, SEDA score, employment (Employment has unemployment and employment to population ratio 15 plus), education (school enrollment, tertiary, years of school primary to tertiary, teacher-pupil ratio primary and an average of math and science score), equality (Gini index, inequality in education and inequality in life expectancy) and finally environment (air quality, terrestrial and marine protected areas, carbon dioxide intensity and electricity production from renewable sources).Findings: The analysis depicts how good a country is in converting their wealth to well-being. The countries that have started well do not necessarily have depicted outstanding progress in Sustainable economic development assessment. Some countries are good in growth and increasing their developmental scores (keeping in mind BCG identified parameters of sustainable development). Further comparisons express a high positive correlation between GDP/Capita with education and equality. There is a very low degree of correlation between GDP/Capita and employment and a low correlation between GDP/Capita and environment. However, there is a negative correlation between Growth and development.Practical Application: Relation between GDP/Capita of countries and some important economic, investment, and sustainability dimensions to judge where a nation stands and what should be added as a prelim agenda to countries dashboard.

show abstract

Section: Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 67%

Connecting Growth with Development and Income with Sustainability, Education, and Employment of Global Powerhouses - A SEDA Perspective

2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The element of Investment includes Health (Approach to health care, mortality and morbidity rates), Education (education equality and access to education) and Infrastructure (water, sanitation, transportation and communication). The element of Sustainability includes Income Inequality (Income disparities), Governance (quality of government, civic freedom, accountability and stability), Environment (quality of environment) and Civil Society (Gender equality and bonds among individuals) (Mukherjee and Ahuja 2017). The figure demonstrates the ten dimensions of sustainable economic development calculated to understand the transformation of each country from wealth to well being.…”

Section: Brief Background Of G20 Nationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Educational quality and access constitutes to an important dimension and health includes its each and access and mortality rates of the people. The quality of environment policies and improvement along with water and transportation is also given equal weightage (Mukherjee and Ahuja 2017). Bhattari (2017) has done a detailed analysis on Economic Growth and development in India and other SAARC countries.…”

Section: Brief Background Of G20 Nationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Further he concluded by saying that being steady, stable and their readiness to march single minded in the path of growth will bring about good level of growth and development in SAARC nations and India as well. Mukherjee and Ahuja (2017) in their research paper aim to depict the recent initiation to evaluate the efficiency of a nation in converting GDP growth to well being in terms of Sustainable Economic Development Assessment scores (SEDA). A good SEDA progress score backs up India' s position in the world as one of the leading Economy and our country has shown a significant improvement in various parameters measured by the BCG to establish sustainable development.…”

Section: Brief Background Of G20 Nationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Comparative Assessment of Sustainable Economic Development Among the G20 Countries

Mukherjee

Ahuja

2018

SSRN Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Wealth to well being-A comparative study of brics peers with reference to SEDA framework

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Connecting Growth with Development and Income with Sustainability, Education, and Employment of Global Powerhouses - A SEDA Perspective

Connecting Growth with Development and Income with Sustainability, Education, and Employment of Global Powerhouses - A SEDA Perspective

A Comparative Assessment of Sustainable Economic Development Among the G20 Countries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About