2022
DOI: 10.1109/tnsm.2022.3197725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web Services Clustering via Exploring Unified Content and Structural Semantic Representation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the QoS-aware service composition has been widely explored for Web services or cloud services in the service computing field [9][10][11][12][13][14]. By reviewing the literature, the techniques for QoS-aware service composition can be classified into four categories: local maximization approaches, linear optimization approaches, approximation approaches, and Pareto-optimization approaches [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the QoS-aware service composition has been widely explored for Web services or cloud services in the service computing field [9][10][11][12][13][14]. By reviewing the literature, the techniques for QoS-aware service composition can be classified into four categories: local maximization approaches, linear optimization approaches, approximation approaches, and Pareto-optimization approaches [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Service composition is widely studied in the traditional service computing field under Internet environment 17‐19 . By reviewing the existing works, they can be roughly divided into three categories: (1) independent service selection approaches ; 20‐22 (2) integer‐programming based approaches ; 23,24 and (3) meta‐heuristic based approaches 25‐28 …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If S neibor is better than the current solution, then replace it. Thus, S teacher is updated with Equation (18).…”
Section: [ T Teacher C Teachermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, QoS-aware service recommendation becomes an effective way to alleviate the problem. 5 There are many QoS-aware service recommendation methods including utility-based methods, 6,7 Skyline-based methods, [8][9][10] collaborative filtering-based methods, [11][12][13][14] matrix factorization-based methods, 15,16 and factorization machine-based methods. [17][18][19] The utility-based and Skyline-based methods assume that users can provide numerical QoS preferences or weights, which is difficult to hold in the real world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that QoS‐aware service composition optimization is an NP‐hard problem, 4 which makes the problem unsolvable in the scenario of a large number of functionally equivalent Web services. Thus, QoS‐aware service recommendation becomes an effective way to alleviate the problem 5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%